At The Washington Post this morning, fact checker Glenn Kessler asks whether the Obama campaign film, “The Road We’ve Traveled,” makes a wrong turn in recounting the story of how the President’s mother struggled to obtain health coverage during her cancer treatment. A thousand words later, Kessler reaches his verdict – “three Pinocchios” for including the story, which a biographer had previously debunked.

It is hardly newsworthy that a campaign film would take liberties with the truth and even less so because this movie comes from director Davis Guggenheim of “An Inconvenient Truth” fame. In any documentary, the producers wield tremendous power because they can choose the moments worth documenting and weave them into any narrative they please.

What distinguishes “The Road We’ve Traveled” from other recent works is the audacity with which it changes history, and not in the good way. Far from hiding these revisions, the movie carelessly flaunts them with images and sound bites undermining its heroic narrative of a young president rising to meet his moment.

In the opening minute, the documentary takes us back to the beginning of the road we’ve traveled, i.e., 2008. Guggenheim splices footage of Obama’s election night speech in Chicago with panicked television reports of the financial markets in New York while narrator Tom Hanks asks, “What do we remember in November of 2008?” Well, not those television reports because, as their datelines clearly show, they came from October 2008.

Why does this matter? By November, Congress had already passed the bailout, and the nation’s largest banks had already accepted capital injections. Obama did not have to “shoulder” the worst moments of the financial crisis because his predecessor, President George W. Bush, already had.

At the three-minute mark, the documentary finally gets to Obama’s first day in office. “And when he faced his country, who looked to him for answers, he would not dwell in blame,” Hanks says. Except, of course, for the very next scene in the movie, where Obama does just that in his inaugural address.  

“Our time of standing pat – of protecting narrow interests and putting off unpleasant decisions – that time has surely passed,” Obama says standing not far from his predecessor. If you are wondering who presided over this “time of standing pat,” see the dozens of subsequent Obama speeches where he answers the question without ambiguity.

Toward the documentary’s 15th minute, we learn that Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have transformed more than just America. “They changed the way the world sees us,” Hanks says. A picture of Obama sitting with the Dalai Lama follows even though Obama became the first president in nearly a generation to refuse to see the Tibetan spiritual leader in 2009.

These are just a few examples of the documentary’s delightful ironies. Anyone with the patience to watch the full 17 minutes will find many more. Even with the best of editors, the Obama reelection narrative would have many holes, but who would have guessed a movie called “The Road We’ve Traveled” would bridge them so poorly. Perhaps having Hollywood on your side isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be.

Comments:


James Of England
Joined
Apr '11
James Of England

EJHill: Here's how this gets done:

Note the lies by time. Provide contradicting, well-sourced evidence. I can handle the technical/creative end. · 1 hour ago

Do you just mean "his stats were wrong" or do you mean Hanks describing the recovery act as providing jobs quickly where they were needed, contrasted with Obama laughing about how it turned out that they didn't provide "shovel ready" jobs? Most of the claims are vague enough that they're not flatly false; are you wanting video or text of authoritative figures/ Obama disagreeing? ie., Are you talking about interleaved video or overlaid text?

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill

If you find a lie then you document it. If you find candidate Obama disagreeing with President Obama you use that, too.

James Of England   Are you talking about interleaved video or overlaid text?

And you do both. Whatever it takes.

Big John
Joined
Feb '11
Big John
Diane Ellis, Ed.: This film is dreadfully boring. What is its purpose? Who is the intended audience? · 6 hours ago

I agree.  The timing is peculiar (why now?), but the purpose is even stranger.  Does this Administration believe that absent this infomercial, their message won't be spread?   Print and television outlets have been repeating--unedited--their incessant messages for the last four years.

EJHill
Joined
May '10
EJHill
Big John The timing is peculiar (why now?)...

They've done a lot of things I recently that I thought they would only try closer to the election.

While we've been concentrating and debating the inside baseball stuff of  the GOP primaries, they've been running the numbers on November.  And I honestly think they're already running scared.

Erik Larsen
Joined
Jan '11
Erik Larsen

Flownover - re Waiting for Superman - which is a documentary about teachers' unions, charter schools, protectionism and the like - to paraphrase Mike Murphy - you start playing that tune and my toes start tapping. But when Guggenheim finished his tune, all I could say was "what??". He missed a lot of easy notes and finished his set early. And I've done that analogy to death!

HVTs
Joined
Oct '10
HVTs

A picture of Obama sitting with the Dalai Lama follows even though Obama became the first president in nearly a generation to refuse to see the Tibetan spiritual leader in 2009.

These are just a few examples of the documentary’s delightful ironies. Anyone with the patience to watch the full 17 minutes will find many more. Even with the best of editors, the Obama reelection narrative would have many holes, but who would have guessed a movie called “The Road We’ve Traveled” would bridge them so poorly.

Perhaps there is more design here than you suggest? The Left uses words and images that contradict reality to transform the narrative to its liking. Audiences retain ‘visuals’ far more effectively than other stimuli. A craven first-term President who bows to tyrants and abandons the morally upright to curry favor with the morally repugnant...I'd want to transform the narrative too. How to inoculate Obama from the charge of sucking up to China at the Dalai Lama's expense? Marginally informed voters ('undecideds') will retain the visual of the two leaders together and subconsciously dismiss that which contradicts this image. The Left/Hollywood thoroughly understands how to use propaganda.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In