Anne R. Pierce · November 9, 2012 at 1:25am

Progressives have been working for a long time to change the culture from the inside out. No revolution necessary.

Just run for political office on a moderate political platform, then change the very structure and meaning of government once in office. Just make sure children spend ever increasing hours in schools at an ever younger age, then teach them – again and again and again– how to become global citizens. Just use movies and television shows to make conservatives look foolish and mean. Just emphasize the “news” that makes liberal politicians look good. Just create a bureaucratic super-structure that can promote the agenda, even when conservatives are in office. Just marginalize the Western tradition, the founding ideas, and the great books and marginalize professors and teachers who take them seriously. Once you've done all this, claim to be the only able representatives of America’s intellectual, artistic, and literary life (Conservatives, by contrast, can then be portrayed as narrow-minded capitalists with little regard for culture.)

There you have it. You’ve not only transformed America; you’ve convinced much of America that you are the only ones sensitive and smart enough to guide it. You are the new elite, and your conservative opponents even do you the favor of calling you such. But the “culture” you created isn’t working out so well. A cursory look at our movies, our television shows, our anxious and overwhelmed children and teenagers, our pathologies, our addictions, our dearth of historical knowledge, our dumbed-down society, our increased willingness to let the end justify the means and to find excuses for irresponsible, violent and abusive behavior, reveals that we are a culture in trouble.

Years ago, I realized the depth of change in our schools and institutions and saw how it was transforming childhood. I kept asking friends, “Shouldn’t we protest when schools subject our children to indoctrination exercises, and routinely send teachers to seminars on how to promote social and political causes? Shouldn’t we question history textbooks that are so thoroughly re-written that the founding principles, the birth of the United States, and the dangers of communism and fascism are all but forgotten? What will happen to our country when these kids reach voting age?” But most parents seemed more concerned about their children’s outward displays of accomplishment than about their children’s actual moral and intellectual advancement. As long as their children were getting good grades, excelling in “activities,” and building good resumes, parents didn’t want to rock the boat.

Thus, American schools choose curriculums with immunity. Captive students are continually reminded of the low points of American history and taught to look at American history “critically.” They receive little, if any, instruction on the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, or the spirit of liberty. American society, they are told, is still dominated by racism, sexism and class distinctions. Classic literature is replaced with 'edgy' works that drive home the same negative message. In multicultural festivals and in “cultural studies” textbooks, however, students experience upbeat portrayals of other cultures. Little or nothing is said about the oppression, poverty and restrictions on freedom in many of the far-off lands they celebrate.

Rather than being permitted to appreciate that America, at its best, unleashes human potential and champions human rights, students are asked to identify their “cultural roots,” the implication being that any “roots” worth having are non-American ones. The modern concept of cultural identity thus, ironically, contributes to children’s sense of uprootedness. It takes the ground out from under them by implying that the ground they are standing on is not theirs. It belongs to some "other"  (i.e., the affluent white male). Children are taught to seek their identity as a distinct caste - resisting and even despising the American norm. That this is the teaching of alienation and that it is particularly discouraging to children in our inner cities is rarely addressed. As conservatives reach out to ethnic groups, they must address the problem of an education that denies our common American bond.

Alongside of the program for political change is the program for moral change, and it relies upon similar tactics: Use the media; make anyone who doesn’t agree with the wholesale rejection of tradition look mean and stupid; teach children to question the outmoded ‘values” of their parents.  Toward this end, saturate society with so much crudeness and crassness that we're finally incapable of being shocked. Mock the idea of virtue. After all, how much change can be achieved if people don’t embrace the idea that each culture defines its own good -- and that the current culture’s definition is the best so far?

I was going to title this piece, “It’s Our Turn to Change the Culture.” But change is easy. A renaissance is going to be hard. We must study the best traditions for inspiration, while being open to the best innovations. We must seek and find intellectual, cultural, political, and moral rebirth. It’s time for people who take the lessons of history and the idea of America seriously to step up and speak up –even if it requires questioning those “elite” universities we’d like our children to attend. The answer to the conservative’s current quandary is not to be more current. It is to be more brave.

    

Comments:


Devereaux
Joined
Jul '10
Devereaux

Once again, Ms. Pierce - smoking hot presentation. You might consider collecting these pieces you've submitted into a collection of essays.

Elsewhere Rachel Lu has proposed '"tinkering" with the educational system when in fact I would approach it with a flame thrower and rebuild it as it once was. You make the same case, albeit in nicer terms. But I'm an old troglodyte, so one doesn't expect "warm & fuzzy" from me. 

In a sense, controlling the terms of the debate is at the core of all this, and   to do that you need to define those terms. If I understand your comments correctly, that is what you propose.

Call it what you will, I would agree the nation needs to again learn what it means to be an American. Dennis Prager has spoken to this before, but that doesn't make it any less crucil. We win ONLY if we teach people what they are losing.

genferei
Joined
Oct '10
genferei

"We must study the best traditions for inspiration, while being open to the best innovations."

Burke and Mao. Aquinas and Lenin. The Federalist Papers and Saudi-financed wahhabist madrasas.

Karen
Joined
May '10
Karen

This is why I love Ricochet. My husband and I were having a very similar discussion just now over dinner. But what does a renaissance look like? Where do we begin? Do we seek out redeeming aspects in our culture and build on those, or do we strive to create something new entirely? Maybe both?

Anne R. Pierce

genferei: "We must study the best traditions for inspiration, while being open to the best innovations."

Burke andMao. Aquinas andLenin. The Federalist Papers andSaudi-financed wahhabist madrasas. · in 1 minute

I  don't see Mao, Lenin wahhabists in the light you imply.  The unimaginable horrors and suffering created by Mao and Lenin are part of the missing history that I say in this article we must find - and learn from.  I don't use the word "best" rhetorically. I mean it in the non-relativist sense.

Edited on November 9, 2012 at 2:10am
dittoheadadt
Joined
Oct '10
dittoheadadt

How about we just figure out how to bypass the so-called mainstream media, and co-opt a couple of major outlets and clean house and make them genuine news outlets (neither right nor left), and take our message directly to the people without first having to be filtered/misrepresented/caricatured by the MSM?  We're not going to reinvent the schools, we're not going to take over Hollywood.  But we can bypass the current media with a 4-year multi-pronged approach and put our unfiltered message into the citizens' hands.  Unless we do that, everything else is just spinning our wheels.  Futile.

Edited on November 9, 2012 at 2:15am
Anne R. Pierce
Karen: This is why I love Ricochet. My husband and I were having a very similar discussion just now over dinner. But what does a renaissance look like? Where do we begin? Do we seek out redeeming aspects in our culture and build on those, or do we strive to create something new entirely? Maybe both? · 2 minutes ago

I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. What do you and your husband think is the best beginning for our renaissance?

George Savage

Brilliant thesis, Anne.  What we need seems the very opposite of where we've lately been heading:  small ball, targeted messaging to the undecided Independent voter.  Well, we won those voters the other day, lost the election anyway, and even if we'd won we weren't addressing the issues at the very core of what ails our republic.

I am most intimately familiar with this passage:  But most parents seemed more concerned about their children’s outward displays of accomplishment than about their children’s actual moral and intellectual advancement. As long as their children were getting good grades, excelling in “activities,” and building good resumes, parents didn’t want to rock the boat.

This is so true.  The lesson for Silicon Valley teens is that rules don't really apply so long as they keep an A average and are on track to attend one of the twenty-or-so colleges that everyone on earth yearns to attend, primarily for the branding effect.  

Our "best and brightest" may be stressed out habitual marijuana smokers, but they will soon have that Yale degree. 

I spend most of my time as a parent combating this awful trend.

Anne R. Pierce

George Savage:

I am most intimately familiar with this passage:  But most parents seemed more concerned about their children’s outward displays of accomplishment than about their children’s actual moral and intellectual advancement. As long as their children were getting good grades, excelling in “activities,” and building good resumes, parents didn’t want to rock the boat.

This is so true.  The lesson for Silicon Valley teens is that rules don't really apply so long as they keep an A average and are on track to attend one of the twenty-or-so colleges that everyone on earth yearns to attend, primarily for the branding effect.  

Our "best and brightest" may be stressed out habitual marijuana smokers, but they will soon have that Yale degree. 

I spend most of my time as a parent combating this awful trend. · 2 minutes ago

Thank you.  It was concern for America's over-scheduled, under-nurtured, mis-taught children that compelled me to deviate from my political/foreign policy roots and write Ships Without a Shore.

~Paules
Joined
Jun '10
~Paules

I wish I had your optimism, dear lady.  You will recall, however, that the European renaissance arrived after a thousand years of darkness.  I'm more likely to take a monastic approach by preserving what we have for a future generation far down the road.  But then I'm feeling maudlin today. The feeling may pass.  Or maybe not.  

Anne R. Pierce
~Paules: I wish I had your optimism, dear lady.  You will recall, however, that the European renaissance arrived after a thousand years of darkness.  I'm more likely to take a monastic approach by preserving what we have for a future generation far down the road.  But then I'm feeling maudlin today. The feeling may pass.  Or maybe not.   · 2 minutes ago

Paules,

I hear you. I'm holding onto my optimism with a thin thread.

Anne R. Pierce

Devereaux: Once again, Ms. Pierce - smoking hot presentation. You might consider collecting these pieces you've submitted into a collection of essays.

Elsewhere Rachel Lu has proposed '"tinkering" with the educational system when in fact I would approach it with a flame thrower and rebuild it as it once was. You make the same case, albeit in nicer terms. But I'm an old troglodyte, so one doesn't expect "warm & fuzzy" from me. 

In a sense, controlling the terms of the debate is at the core of all this, and   to do that you need todefine those terms. If I understand your comments correctly, that is what you propose.

Thanks, Devereaux.  You do set up the challenge: How do we influence terms of the debate and at the same time deal with so much institutionalized, entrenched changing of and re-defining of the culture?

Edited on November 9, 2012 at 2:44am
Indaba
Joined
Apr '12
Indaba

Rather than being permitted to appreciate that America, at its best, unleashes human potential and champions human rights, students are asked to identify their “cultural roots,” the implication being that any “roots” worth having are non-American ones.

Agreed. As an immigrant myself, the last thing I wanted to do at high school is talk about my homeland. 

Also, the American businesses in Zambia and Africa were shining lights on how to treat workers, how to do business and how to be part of a community.  

RightinChicago
Joined
Jul '12
RightinChicago

I must point out, that we only got a Renaissance after a long period of the Dark and Middle Ages. If the U.S. is analagous to Rome, then first the U.S. must perish and plunge the world into barbarity before we can have a Renaissance. I truly fear that this is the only way. Republics all self-imolate.

goodburker
Joined
Sep '12
goodburker

I'm not sure how you change the education system while the teachers' unions control who can and cannot teach.  I think charter schools are a start, and must continue to be championed.  But charter schools, too, are only as good as the curriculum, and the teachers teaching that curriculum.  Maybe there needs to be a concerted, organized effort to create charter schools modeled on the classical curriculum(grammar, logic, rhetoric).  Here's one school that adopted a classical curriculum showcasing, what at first glance, appears to be impressive results: http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/classical-education-enlivens-denver-catholic-school/

Dennis Prager had an idea, very much worth considering.  Obama shrewdly focused on his constituencies:  women, minority and youth votes, demonizing conservatism.  And it worked.  

Taking just the youth vote for instance, he suggested that every time Obama visited a college campus, there should have been a representative from the conservative side who would appear afterwards to present the other argument.  Using an "inkblot" approach, little by little, school by school you make the case for conservatism, and open the eyes of these young men and women that they are being played by the left.

Devereaux
Joined
Jul '10
Devereaux

Anne R. Pierce

Devereaux: In a sense, controlling the terms of the debate is at the core of all this, and   to do that you need todefine those terms. If I understand your comments correctly, that is what you propose.

Thanks, Devereaux.  You do set up the challenge: How do we define terms of the debate and at the same time deal with so much institutionalized, entrenched definition of terms? · 0 minutes ago

Well, let me give my very small contribution. In my old Guard unit I deecided that there was not enough discussion of current affairs (think Lincoln-Douglas and the crowds that attended to listen). So I instituted 30 minutes every Sun morning of drill when we "discussed"some current topic. Took a little prodding from the boss, but it took off and soon I didn't need to needle anyone to contribute to the discussion.

Today we seem to be afraid of discussing things with our neighbors. ?But how else are we to speak to the issues and get people to think.

Just a thought.

Indaba
Joined
Apr '12
Indaba

Anne R. Pierce

Karen: This is why I love Ricochet. My husband and I were having a very similar discussion just now over dinner. But what does a renaissance look like? Where do we begin? Do we seek out redeeming aspects in our culture and build on those, or do we strive to create something new entirely? Maybe both? · 2 minutes ago

I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. What do you and your husband think is the best beginning for our renaissance? · 33 minutes ago

Taking a leaf out the Lefties book and advocating for curriculum Content. 

Here in Canada, we have health studies. In Grade 5, the curriculum gets the students to put condoms on cucumbers. My son told me about this.  I was on the Parents Association and put together a request that the math course teach how to do a 20 year budget for a baby growing up, and that  the boys were made aware that they will have their wages garnished to pay child support.  I asked that it get linked to love and to marriage and to family.

I also suggested that it might be intimidating to demonstrate on a cucumber :>)

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

a thousand years of darkness.

The Dark Ages are a myth. 


Joined
Aug '12
MJBubba

The progressive domination of big education is having an unexpected outcome in my part of flyover country.  My sons and their college-age buddies are becoming more libertarian.  Their minds have been poisoned against my social conservative religion, but they realize that they are being manipulated by an intellectually bankrupt left.   The direction they are headed in is more like western libertarianism; socially liberal and fiscally conservative.

Pseudodionysius
Joined
Sep '10
Pseudodionysius

Remember, we've been through this before:

“The failure of medieval Christendom was not a function of the demonstrated or demonstrable falsity of central doctrinal truth claims of the Christian faith … It was, at root, a botching of moral execution, a failure to practice what was preached.” – Brad Gregory, “The Unintended Reformation”

“We are waiting, not for another political savior or television personality, but for a Dominic or a Francis, an Ignatius or a Wesley, a Wilberforce or a Newman, a Bonhoeffer or a Solzhenitsyn. Only sanctity can justify Christianity’s existence; only sanctity can make the case for faith; only sanctity, or the hope thereof, can ultimately redeem the world.” – Ross Douthat, “Bad Religion”

Where did I dig them up? From a September column written by Philadelphia Archbishop Chaput called How we got where we are, and the value of the past. Here's the money quote:

In early September, the Gallup Organization found that 60 percent of Americans – a record high — have little or no trust in the mass media’s ability “to report the news fully, accurately and fairly.” The sharpest decline in trust occurred among political independents, the least partisan American voters.

Edited on November 9, 2012 at 3:07am
Mollie Hemingway, Ed.

Just tonight at dinner, I told my husband that the only thing I'm really certain of right now is that we'll continue to do whatever it takes to give our children a Classical education. You've explained very well why it is that we work so hard to do that.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In