Ricochet's own Jennifer Rubin has been following the story of Richard Grenell on her Washington Post blog, Right Turn. Richard Grenell was recently hired by the Romney campaign to serve as a spokesman on foreign policy. As luck would have it for a former governor with little foreign policy experience, this former John Bolton advisor is a registered Republican and staunchly opposes the Obama administration's stance on key national security issues. There is only one problem: Mr. Grenell is gay.

Pieces in two conservative publications, the National Review and Daily Caller, reflected the uproar by some social conservatives over the appointment. [UPDATE, 4:30 p.m.: Although Grenell also raised the ire of liberal commentators with now-deleted tweets about certain prominent women, none of the sources I spoke with mentioned the tweets as a factor in his resignation decision.]

In the National Review, Matthew J. Franck wrote late last week: “Suppose Barack Obama comes out — as Grenell wishes he would — in favor of same-sex marriage in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. How fast and how publicly will Richard Grenell decamp from Romney to Obama?"

I believe we can have a rational debate over gay marriage within the conservative sphere without forcing out those who are gay from our movement. This is a shameful moment for us conservatives and I hope we are beginning the process of rejecting such intolerance. While I am saddened that Mr. Grenell decided to resign from the campaign for personal reasons, I am proud that Governor Romney demonstrated the fortitude to stand by his selection of an imminently qualified advisor like Mr. Grenell and did not take the easy way out by bowing to the less savory aspects of social conservatism.

I would like to know if I am alone with my indignation over the treatment of Mr. Grenell and the pressure for him to resign.  In the alternative, I would be happy to hear the counterargument if a fellow Ricochetian feels an openly gay man should not be advising on Republican campaign. How should we proceed as a movement?  And, a slightly different question, how do you think we will actually proceed as a movement?

Comments:


The Great Adventure!
Joined
Dec '10
The Great Adventure!

Nope, you're not alone.  

My belief system firmly states that homosexuality is a sinful behavior, but then so is gluttony.  I get really annoyed at those who constantly push for advancement of a gay agenda, but I also have encountered a lot of gay people who are talented, thoughtful, pleasant people.  I've also encountered a lot of really annoying right wingers.  If given the choice, I'd rather work with the more pleasant folks.

Casey Taylor
Joined
Jun '10
Casey Taylor

You're not alone, and it is shameful.  This type of thing is a major reason I left the Republican Party.  It saddens me to see that things haven't changed.

Casey Taylor
Joined
Jun '10
Casey Taylor

In the National Review, Matthew J. Franck wrote late last week: “Suppose Barack Obama comes out — as Grenell wishes he would — in favor of same-sex marriage in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. How fast and how publicly will Richard Grenell decamp from Romney to Obama?"

What a specious argument!  One small thought experiment shows how silly and offensive Franck's reasoning is:

Suppose Barack Obama comes out — as Keyes wishes he would — in favor of reparations in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. How fast and how publicly will Alan Keyes decamp from Romney to Obama?

Or maybe this:

Suppose Barack Obama comes out — as Rubio wishes he would — in favor of the Dream Act in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. How fast and how publicly will Marco Rubio decamp from Romney to Obama?

Or this:

Suppose Barack Obama comes out — as Coulter wishes he would — in favor of voluntary contraceptive coverage in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. How fast and how publicly will Ann Coulter decamp from Romney to Obama?

What an ass.

Edited on May 2, 2012 at 6:45am
Roberto
Joined
Mar '11
Roberto
Pat in Obamaland: I believe we can have a rational debate over gay marriage within the conservative sphere without forcing out those who are gay from our movement.  · 29 minutes ago

Perhaps you might consider contributing to such a conversation by not indulging in outrageous calumnies? Mr. Grenell holds a political position that is strongly at odds with many voters. Next time you deign to burst forth with your indignation perhaps you could find the self-restraint to hold yourself to the actual issue instead of vapid foolishness such as, "forcing out those who are gay".

Kirsten Weiss
Joined
Aug '11
Kirsten Weiss

You're not alone.

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole

Yeah, it's this kind of nonsense that made me stop reading NRO.

Being anti-gay is also a loser in the long term for the conservative movement and the Republican party.  Young people trend far more libertarian and far more progressive about gays. 

Edited on May 2, 2012 at 2:48am
Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas

"There is only one problem: Mr. Grenell is gay."

This is frankly, flatly, false. This isn't a "gay purge". He was pressured to leave because he's a crusader for redifning marriage, against his own party's principles, and the candidate he supposedly represented,  and he has a lousy habit of criticizing his bosses when they don't back him on this issue, not because he's a homosexual. He publicly ripped George W. Bush when Dubya didn't support his agenda while he was working for him, and after. Pretty sure there are gays in the GOP that don't rip their party and bosses because they don't agree on the issue, and they're doing just fine. Foreign policy may have been this man's area of expertise, but that always seemed to take a back seat to his cause.

It was a bad idea in the first place to hire such a man. Would you hire someone that mocks you and your organization? This guy erased a bunch of his tweets after it was discovered what a backstabber he was, but it's too late. Too many people saw them. 


Joined
Dec '11
Guruforhire

The Great Adventure!: Nope, you're not alone.  

My belief system firmly states that homosexuality is a sinful behavior, but then so is gluttony.  I get really annoyed at those who constantly push for advancement of a gay agenda, but I also have encountered a lot of gay people who are talented, thoughtful, pleasant people.  I've also encountered a lot of really annoying right wingers.  If given the choice, I'd rather work with the more pleasant folks. · 55 minutes ago

Absolutely.

I am pretty agnostic on the issue outside of a procedural concern.

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas
Fred Cole:   Young people trend far more libertarian and far more progressive about gays.  

And in the 60's and 70's, they were far more progressive about socialism, drugs, pre-marital sex, divorce... until they grew up and learned the hard way that support for such things is dumb, has real consequences, and that they should have listened to their fuddy duddy elders in the first place. A lot of Reagan's voters in 80 were young Democrats once that learned about reality the hard way.

Changing your party's direction to serve the whims of youth neither serves your country nor your party. 

Palaeologus
Joined
Jul '10
Palaeologus

Matthew J. Franck wrote late last week: “Suppose Barack Obama comes out — as Grenell wishes he would — in favor of same-sex marriage in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. How fast and how publicly will Richard Grenell decamp from Romney to Obama?"

First, I'll roll those dice all day long. Obama wouldn't dream of doing that during the campaign because it would be a massive loser for him politically.

Second, I don't care whether one of Romney's foreign policy advisers is gay.

Third, I disagree with my good internet pal Casey. I don't find anything shameful in the evidence. There are a ton of cultural hot buttons in politics and the fact that this is one is just that: a fact.

We can talk about merit and how such "irrelevancies" shouldn't influence these decisions all day long. It is not necessarily shameful that some folks assert a given behavior is unacceptable.

Speaking of unacceptable, Jen Rubin is smart, funny, and a tad obnoxious: I like her. But she hasn't a clue what sells outside Washington, and her attacks on so-cons are amazingly similar to those she makes on Paulistas.

Pat in Obamaland
Joined
May '10
Pat in Obamaland

Roberto

Pat in Obamaland: I believe we can have a rational debate over gay marriage within the conservative sphere without forcing out those who are gay from our movement.  · 29 minutes ago

Perhaps you might consider contributing to such a conversation by not indulging in outrageous calumnies? Mr. Grenell holds a political position that is strongly at odds with many voters. Next time you deign to burst forth with your indignation perhaps you could find the self-restraint to hold yourself to the actual issueinstead of vapid foolishness such as, "forcing out those who are gay". · 1 hour ago

And what is that issue? That an advisor on foreign affairs differs from the majority of the Republican Party on one issue which in no way pertains to foreign affairs?

Do we expect every member of the party to be absolutely, 100% straight-line conservative?  Of course not, reasonable minds can differ. Do we even expect every member of the party to be against gay marriage? Of course not, again, reasonable minds can differ. It seems to me that the only reason why Mr. Grenell was unacceptable was that he held one heretical view and he happened to be gay.

Casey Taylor
Joined
Jun '10
Casey Taylor

Palaeologus

Matthew J. Franck wrote late last week: “Suppose Barack Obama comes out — as Grenell wishes he would — in favor of same-sex marriage in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention. How fast and how publicly will Richard Grenell decamp from Romney to Obama?"

First, I'll roll those dice all day long. Obama wouldn't dream of doing that during the campaign because it would be a massive loser for him politically.

Second, I don't care whether one of Romney's foreign policy advisers is gay.

Third, I disagree with my good internet pal Casey. I don't find anything shameful in the evidence. There are a ton of cultural hot buttons in politics and the fact that this is one is just that: a fact.

We can talk about merit and how such "irrelevancies" shouldn't influence these decisions all day long. It is not necessarily shameful that some folks assert a given behavior is unacceptable.

You are my favorite person to have disagree with my eminently sensible conclusions.

I'm with Podhoretz on this one.  He has a wonderful take on this issue, and his article at Commentary is well worth the read.

C. U. Douglas
Joined
Apr '11
C. U. Douglas

There's more than one narrative on this.

It's also been suggested that Grenell has been receiving quite a bit of personal vitriol from the left for other views he holds.

And I know this is a total logical fallacy, but I tend to take what Rubin says with a grain of salt.  She's shown she has little respect for social conservatives, and I suspect she'd take the Progressive narrative and run with it because we social conservatives are dumb and stupid and should have just voted for Romney already.  Excuse me for my pettiness there.

Fred Cole
Joined
Nov '11
Fred Cole

Douglas

Changing your party's direction to serve the whims of youth neither serves your country nor your party.  · 59 minutes ago

I suspect in 20 years I'll be proven right.  Perhaps much sooner.

Casey Taylor
Joined
Jun '10
Casey Taylor

Palaeologus

Speaking of unacceptable, Jen Rubin is smart, funny, and a tad obnoxious: I like her. But she hasn't a clue what sells outside Washington, and her attacks on so-cons are amazingly similar to those she makes on Paulistas. · 34 minutes ago

It's the voice.  I try hard to listen to Left Coast/Right Coast because I like Mickey Kaus so much, but I just can't get past her manner of speaking.  Yes, I prefer Kaus' voice to Rubin's.  She grates on me that much.

Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas

Fred Cole

Douglas

Changing your party's direction to serve the whims of youth neither serves your country nor your party.  · 59 minutes ago

I suspect in 20 years I'll be proven right.  Perhaps much sooner. · 11 minutes ago

I suppose we'll both see, sooner or later.

Casey Taylor
Joined
Jun '10
Casey Taylor

Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) tweeted 2 hours ago:

I don't understand why it was okay for Dick Cheney to disagree with Bush on gay issues, but Mitt's foreign policy guy can't.

This from a man - Jonah - who knows Grenell well.  I've only met Grenell twice, but each time he was a very professional, passionate defender of the Right.  He's a stand-up guy, to boot.  John Bolton, our numero uno foreign policy guru, loves him.  There's simply no good reason to drive him out.  But, as our own Ben Domenech says:

The rule, as a staffer is: never be the story.

Edited on May 2, 2012 at 6:44am
Douglas
Joined
Mar '11
Douglas

C. U. Douglas: 

And I know this is a total logical fallacy, but I tend to take what Rubin says with a grain of salt.  She's shown she has little respect for social conservatives, and I suspect she'd take the Progressive narrative and run with it because we social conservatives are dumb and stupid and should have just voted for Romney already.  o

Rubin is in the "with friends like these..." category. 

DocJay
Joined
Jul '11
DocJay

I know a number of gay conservatives. None care about forcing a marriage issue and are greatly concerned with economic issues. They don't care about the military issue as don't ask, don't tell was fine for them. They dislike or despise Obama and do a lot for the GOP. They could care less about anyone else's moral judgment of them and will not impose their moral judgements on others. Probably I'm unpopular with thinking these guys are OK but they're my friends and I welcome their vote this November.

M1919A4
Joined
Nov '10
M1919A4

Casey Taylor: Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) tweeted 2 hours ago:

I don't understand why it was okay for Dick Cheney to disagree with Bush on gay issues, but Mitt's foreign policy guy can't.

7 minutes ago

Casey, did VP Cheney openly turn on President Bush over their differences on this issue?  I have no recollection of his doing that.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In