As some of you know, I make my living as a certified nerd.  For those of you with similar tendencies, this solid rocket booster view of a space shuttle launch will prove awe-inspiring.

Comments:


LKSkinner
Joined
Mar '12
Lisa

As a fellow nerd (although not certified) I totally agree - awe-inspiring indeed! Thanks so much for  a very different view of a shuttle launch.

BrentB67
Joined
May '12
BrentB67

Coolest thing I've ever seen on You Tube. Thank you for sharing.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

"Riding the Booster" would be a good title for an AC/DC song.

Mark Wilson
Joined
May '10
Mark Wilson

It's amazing how long chuff and debris continues to come out of the nozzle.

Jude
Joined
Jan '12
Jude

Dang I love that. With the testosterone boost that gave me I think my beard just grew another inch.

Paul-FB
Joined
Feb '11
Paul-FB

What an unbelievable ride on The Rocket, even if it was the slow ride back to terra firma, so to speak.  Thanks for sharing and I agree that this is one of the coolest videos on You Tube!!

River
Joined
Aug '10
River

Thrilling and awe-inspiring. I loved watching the acceleration and shock waves in the air, among other things.

Misthiocracy
Joined
Aug '10
Misthiocracy

I thought the audio would make a good ambient lullaby, I converted this into an mp3.  I edited it to take out the extra couple of separations though.

If you're interested, here's a link to the mp3 file.  This link will only work for about 30 days or so before it's automatically deleted: http://www.sendspace.com/file/eiewf1

Edited on June 20, 2012 at 10:48pm
John Walker
Joined
Oct '10
John Walker

Solid rocket boosters can be impressive, but they are crude and inherently dangerous.  They are by their very nature a monopropellant, which John D. Clark described in Ignition! as a compound which “contains in itself both the fuel and the oxidizer…. But! Any intimate mixture of a fuel and an oxidizer is a potential explosive, and a molecule with one reducing (fuel) end and one oxidizing end, separated by a pair of firmly crossed fingers, is an invitation to disaster.”

Indeed….  The entire concept of the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) and the mobile launcher was that all hazardous operations were done at the launch pad, so even on a Really Bad Day you only lost 1/3 of your access to space.  With stacking solid rocket boosters in the VAB, every time you do it you roll the dice, and if they come up snake eyes, you lose your access to space for a decade or maybe forever, given budget constraints.

This is the disaster which did not happen during the Shuttle era.  So, of course, the Congress, in their wisdom, have mandated the Space Launch System which will continue this absurd risk.

Severely Ltd.
Joined
Oct '10
Severely Ltd.

Right out of 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Awesome in the modern and [even more so] the traditional sense.

Fricosis Guy
Joined
Jun '11
Fricosis Guy

I've read the Feynman appendix to the Rogers Commission report one too many times. I can't enjoy anything to do w/ the Shuttle's solid fuel boosters.


Would you like to comment on this Conversation?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In