Posted February 7, 2012 at 5:46am · Edited April 3, 2012 at 9:10pm · Just Curious

This asinine little graphic was posted on Facebook by a liberal college classmate of mine. Can anyone refute the statements here?

Asininity

Eric Ames: <duplicate>

Edited on February 7, 2012 at 6:19am

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

Answer by Ottoman Umpire

Posted February 7, 2012 at 11:32pm · Edited February 8, 2012 at 2:57am

The graphic omits this little thing called the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights.  And The Declaration of Independence, where "God" is in the first sentence, "Creator" in the second, and "divine Providence" in the last.

This is like saying, "Did you KNOW that the ORIGINAL Constitution didn't mention the words 'press,' 'democracy,' or 'privacy' at all? OMG!"  (Except, of course, I'd have to make it all blue and red to get the point across, and replace the G of OMG. Maybe we could get an intern from Seventeen to do the layout.)

For that matter, the Right to Privacy didn't exist until seven Justices, sitting around the Constitution like it was some crystal ball or hunk of rotting cheese, detected "emanations" and "penumbras" that enabled them to discern said Right, which they thus codified in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965).  

I'm sure your purist friend will be getting to that one any day now.  

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

Answer by Eric Ames

Posted February 7, 2012 at 6:21am

What he has here is more or less correct even if a little smarmy. What is omitted is that In God We Trust was added to coins in 1864, and has appeared on all coins since 1938. Changes to the national motto and the Pledge were, as far as I know, adopted as Cold War era gestures to distinguish us from the godless commies.

Pseudodionysius: Two points of interest. The United States was founded by people's who wanted to escape the establishment of a national church, subservient to the State under the monarchy. This is a doctrine known as Erastianism. Hope is not an emotion, but one of the theological virtues, as distinct from the cardinal virtues.

Pseudodionysius: Further, no religious test shall ever be required as a test for high office, but a conscience clause exemption shall be forbidden under the HHS directive. Fascinating as the Founding Father Mr. Spock once said. Live Long and Prosper, unless you silently scream.

Western Chauvinist: I'd say it's accurate until the last editorial paragraph interpreting the meaning of the founding as "equality" -- that was the French Revolution. As we conservatives know, the founding was intended to protect the God-given rights of the individual from an overbearing government. Thus, the separation of powers. Fear of responsibility and failure consumes the Left.

jrad22: Would agree about the last paragraph the initial facts don't support this idea of "fear being traded like a commodity." Who is trading this fear? Who is afraid? 

"One from many" definitely sounds Rousseau / French Revolution - esque 

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

Answer by Robert Barraud Taylor

Posted February 15, 2012 at 2:24pm

A little odd, isn't it, that this "asinine little graphic" notes that we didn't have paper currency until 1861...was it written by a Ron Paul supporter?  Was gen-u-wine hard gold money God-free?  Are gold coins the currency of Atheists? 

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

Answer by bereket kelile

Posted February 14, 2012 at 12:12am

Here's some more facts:93% of Americans want "In God We Trust" to remain on our money.90% want "under God" to stay in the Pledge of Allegiance.84% support references to God in schools, gov't buildings, and other public places.76% are in favor of displaying the Ten Commandments on public property.Your friend doesn't understand that we have a tradition that is very religious and he/she is not interested in preserving it.Here's an article that addresses this issue (sorry if it's not hyperlinked; I'm on my iPad):http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=99351

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

Answer by Elizabeth Herring

Posted February 15, 2012 at 3:23am

It  didn't include the right to vote, either.  That was left to the Electoral College for the president and VP .... and to the states to decided how to elect their own politicians.  

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.


Would you like to answer this Question?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In