Posted July 17, 2012 at 6:40pm · Just Curious

The ACA was saved only by rewriting it.  How common is this?  Why does not the legislature have to vote on the "judicial" version.  I attended a Federalist Society talk on the just finished Supreme Court term in San Francisco last night, and it was too well attended to ask the wonderful (but depressing last night) John Yoo.

Also, is it subject to an "origination clause" challenge?

jpark: Another recent example of rewriting (or burning down the village to save it) came from Chief Justice Roberts in the Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District case, where the Court said the MUD could bail out even though it didn't register voters like the Voting Rights Act seems to require.  The alternative would have been to find the VRA unconstitutional.

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

No answers yet



Would you like to answer this Question?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In