Posted Feb 11 at 5:51am · Edited Apr 3 at 10:59am · Just Curious

Having an argument with some pinko who believes in controlling speech

So I need data about how about money doesn't correlate to results.

Cutlass: Changed to an "Answer."

Edited on Feb 14 at 5:16pm

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

Answer by Cutlass

Posted Feb 14 at 5:14pm

Oops, looks like I posed my answer in the wrong place.

Anyway, I liked this tidbit (from Steven Levitt in Freakonomics, 2003):

 "In a typical election period that includes campaigns for the presidency, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, about $1 billion is spent per year—which sounds like a lot of money, unless you care to mea- sure it against something seemingly less important than democratic elections.

It is the same amount, for instance, that Americans spend every year on chewing gum."

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.

Answer by Cutlass

Posted Feb 14 at 5:15pm

 Fred,

Freakonomics debunked this myth of campaign spending (this is a podcast transcript, I believe more data is in the first Freakonomics book).  Here's one relevant study (google turns up others). 

As with every thing from baseball to education, it all depends on how you spend the money. Imagine that?

Join Ricochet or Sign In to add your comment.


Would you like to answer this Question?

Become a Member for $3.67 a month.

Join the Conversation
Already a member? Sign In
Loading

Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In