What's Ricochet?

We're a right-of-center community -- one that's united not just by shared principles, but by a desire for a smart, civil and above all lively discussion of the world around us.

Do we all agree on every aspect of policy? No. Do we all march in lockstep with RNC talking points? Of course not.

But, deep down, we're all basically conservative or libertarian. We each dissent from the current, leftward drift in national policy, and we want to see something done about it. And what we're creating, above all, is a strong, unapologetic, civilized, inviting conservative meeting place.

Please join us!


Ricochet Blog

Busy System Admin
Joined
Feb '10

As promised last week, we are moving to new servers to speed up the site and resolve several other issues.  After a lot of work over the last week on caching issues, merging in changes from development, and testing, I think we are ready.

The migration to new servers will begin around 4 AM Eastern, or 1 AM Pacific.  Ricochet.com will be down, probably for several hours.  So get your fix now!

Here's what you can expect after the migration:

  • Faster load speeds.  In our testing, typically at least twice as fast (when the page is in cache).  Some pages may still occasionally load slowly, but that is because they have not recently been viewed and thus are no longer in the cache.
  • Much faster publish times!  In our testing, comments go up in 6-10 seconds (conservatively) instead of 30 seconds or more on the current system.  I've seen times as low as 2 seconds.
  • A few new features that have been waiting for a good migration to hop onto.
  • Some unforeseen bugs that will inevitably pop up in spite of our testing.  So please hang tight!  We'll fix them soon.

Some technical details may be forthcoming, later, for those who are curious.

Busy System Admin
Joined
Feb '10
Migrating to new servers

Esteemed members and readers of Ricochet,

I'm happy to announce we've been working on much-needed changes to our infrastructure at Ricochet, and we hope to migrate to new servers in the next week or two.

There may be some temporary disruptions in the service, but please be patient; these are typical during such a big transition.

After the transition, you should experience:

  • A faster site overall
  • Much faster posting times (less than 10 seconds to be sure; but in our tests, as little as 2 seconds).  Currently it takes more than 30 seconds just to post a comment, due to complex caching issues in the system.
  • Fewer (hopefully zero) "transaction failed" errors.  I know I'm not the only one who has been seeing these recently.
  • More stability; and other improvements.

Also, once we finish this transition, we should be able to focus more on adding new features to the site and improving it in other ways.  The problems listed above have been taking up a lot of our time and we are eager to put them behind us.

Thank you as always for being members and readers of Ricochet!

(Graphic courtesy of EJHill)

In an earlier post this weekend, The Logo discussed how, on a per capita basis, Ricochet attracts more visitors from blue states than from red. That discovery led us to look at how we ranked among cities -- not major metropolitan areas, but the municipalities themselves.

As with the states, the biggest cities send us the most visitors. New York (defined, curiously, as Manhattan and Brooklyn; Queens, The Bronx, and Staten Island are counted separately) is first at about 18,000 unique visitors. Much smaller but politically-driven Washington, D.C. is second. Nothing too surprising.

Cities that Send Ricochet the Most Visitors

  1. New York
  2. Washington, DC
  3. Los Angeles
  4. Chicago
  5. Houston
  6. San Francisco
  7. Denver
  8. Minneapolis
  9. Dallas
  10. Atlanta
  11. Seattle
  12. Austin
  13. Arlington
  14. San Diego
  15. Madison
  16. London
  17. Phoenix
  18. Philadelphia
  19. Toronto
  20. Portland, OR

When we change this to a per capita ranking (see notes for additional details), here's what we find:

Places that Send Ricochet the Most Visitors per Capita

  1. Hopkins, MN
  2. Clarksburg, WV
  3. Charlottesville, VA
  4. State College, PA
  5. Decatur, GA
  6. Naples, FL
  7. Midvale, UT
  8. Princeton, NJ
  9. Beverly Hills
  10. Morgantown, WV
  11. Winter Park, FL
  12. West Chester, PA
  13. Ithaca, NY
  14. Spring, TX
  15. DC Metro
  16. Culver City, CA
  17. Newport, RI
  18. Minneapolis
  19. Madison, WI
  20. Cambridge, MA

First of all, let's hear it for Hopkins, MN and Clarksburg, WV! We don't really know why they're at the top of our leader boards, but we're interested in finding out. About 15% of the top 100 towns come from places like Hopkins and Clarksburg. Then we notice a few other things:

Urban Areas

The DC metro area and Minneapolis grace our top twenty. Others include Atlanta (#30), Denver (#40), Seattle (#54), San Francisco (#56), St. Louis (#67), and New York City (#76).

Suburbs, Enclaves, or Commuter Towns Attached to Blue Metro Areas

Beverly Hills (#9); Lynnwood, WA (# 22); Smyrna, GA (#23); La Jolla, CA (#25), Redmond, WA (#28), Brentwood, TN (#37), and Germantown, TN (#38) are examples of towns where a lot of conservatives live -- probably quietly -- under the influence of a large, blue metro area. Hopkins, MN (#1) probably fits in this category as well.

And then there's West Hollywood (#27), which... isn't what we expected. But we're happy to have you!

College Towns

About one third of our top 100 consists of what are generally considered to be college towns. State capitals like Madison, Richmond, and Austin may not fit perfectly into this bucket, but they're included here anyway with that caveat. Here's a list of those within our top 100:

3 Charlottesville, VA Univ. of VA
4 State College, PA Penn State
5 Decatur, GA Emory U.
8 Princeton, NJ Princeton
10 Morgantown, WV West Virginia Univ.
13 Ithaca, NY Cornell
19 Madison, WI Univ. of Wisconsin
20 Cambridge, MA Harvard, MIT
21 Greenville, SC Bob Jones, Furman
26 Palo Alto, CA Stanford
30 Chapel Hill, NC Univ. of North Carolina
33 Newark, DE Univ. of Delaware
36 Ann Arbor, MI Univ. of Michigan
45 San Luis Obispo Cal Poly
48 Annapolis, MD U.S. Naval Academy, St. John's
51 West Lafayette Purdue Univ.
60 Burlington, VT Univ. of Vermont
62 Knoxville, TN Univ. of Tennessee
65 Bloomington, IN Univ. of Indiana
70 Berkeley, CA Univ. of California
72 Tempe, AZ Arizona State
79 Austin, TX Univ. of Texas
80 Columbia, SC Univ. of South Carolina
81 Moscow, ID Univ. of Idaho
86 Amherst, MA Amherst College, UMass
88 Oxford, MS Ole Miss Univ.
92 Evanston, IL Northwestern
93 Boulder, CO Univ. of Colorado
95 Columbia, MO Univ. of Missouri
99 Gainesville, FL Univ. of Florida
100 Corvallis, OR Oregon State Univ.
     

Although it's hard to pigeonhole everyone, we're surprised at how much resonance Ricochet seems to have in places with a strong left/progressive influence: college towns and metro areas chief among them. From our personal experience, we've noticed that conservatives feel ideologically isolated when substantially outnumbered by noisy, self-congratulatory leftists. It seems as if we're alone, even though we really aren't, and perhaps that's what leads us to online communities like Ricochet.

So you're more likely to find someone reading Ricochet in Austin (#79) than in Dallas (#125), in Amherst (#86) than in Boston (#145), or in Santa Cruz (#139) than in San Diego (#203).

In other words, red dots in blue blobs.

Notes:

  • Only towns of 15,000 or more were included, because there were too many odd categorization artifacts otherwise.  
  • The only major metropolitan area we included was for DC, and that's because the individual suburbs (Reston, Arlington, Alexandria, etc.), along with DC itself, were so consistently high in our rankings.  All other cities were just the municipalities proper.
  • Rural areas are reported by county. Unincorporated parts of Jefferson County (TN), Hennepin County (MN), and Shelby County (TN) were the only rural areas to make the top 500, but they didn't crack the top 100.
  • The analysis was based on unique visitors over an approximately three-month period starting in January 2011.

Good news!  Monaco, Papua New Guinea and French Guyana have risen into the ranks of the places that send us visitors (recall this discussion from December), although Turkmenistan, North Korea, and Mali remain stubborn hold-outs.

But what about within the U.S.? When we sort the states by the visitors they send us, it's no surprise: the biggest states rank at the top:

States That Send Ricochet the Most Visitors

  1. California
  2. New York
  3. Texas
  4. Illinois
  5. Virginia
  6. Florida
  7. Pennsylvania
  8. Ohio
  9. Washington
  10. Colorado
  11. Minnesota
  12. Georgia
  13. Massachusetts
  14. Michigan
  15. North Carolina
  16. New Jersey
  17. Maryland
  18. District of Columbia
  19. Arizona
  20. Missouri

But if you adjust the ranking according to population, things start to get more interesting:

States That Send Ricochet the Most  Visitors, Per Capita

  1. District of Columbia
  2. Virginia
  3. Colorado
  4. Minnesota
  5. North Dakota
  6. Washington
  7. Oregon
  8. Maryland
  9. Massachusetts
  10. New York
  11. Connecticut
  12. Illinois
  13. California
  14. Utah
  15. New Hampshire
  16. Missouri
  17. South Dakota
  18. Vermont
  19. Arizona
  20. Alaska

D.C. sends us far and away the most visitors per capita, and it's only because of the D.C. suburbs that Virginia ranks #2. If you proceed through the rest of top 13, only North Dakota leans conservative. Not exactly the centers of rock-ribbed, red meat conservatism you might expect.

That led us to take a more detailed look into the data. The Logo will discuss our findings later this weekend.

So, if Lauren is our interim morning editor, what happened to Emily? 

Emily is still with us as a contributor, but she has a new, full-time editor's gig at The Blaze -- Glenn Beck's new online publication.  We were terribly sorry to see her go, but it's a great opportunity for her and we look forward to close ties between Ricochet and The Blaze because of her presence there. 

Congratulations, Emily!  And don't be a stranger. 

Please join us in welcoming Lauren Fink as morning editor.  Lauren is graciously tackling this role on an interim basis -- probably until the beginning of April -- but the plan is to keep her active in various part-time editing capacities going forward. 

You can read Lauren's profile here

Many of you know that our monthly price is pegged to the price of a grande caffe latte at Starbucks. Well, we've been told by their fine baristas (we check with their flagship store at Pike Place Market in Seattle), that said price has risen from $3.47 to $3.58.

So, effective April 4, our monthly price for new memberships is rising to $3.58. (If you're a member prior to April 4, then your price will remain the same.)

Also, monthly subscribers now have an option to switch over to our discounted annual plan of $29.95. To do this, go to your "My Account" page (using the link in the upper right hand corner), and then hit the "Manage Subscription and Billing" button.

Update: It's official... we can blame global warming. From the New York Times:

In the last few years, coffee yields have plummeted here and in many of Latin America’s other premier coffee regions as a result of rising temperatures and more intense and unpredictable rains, phenomena that many scientists link partly to global warming.

Like Tommy De Seno, The Logo finds himself in a lot of political skirmishes with those on the Pretty Far Left. They often take this form:

Young woman with clipboard, wearing Greenpeace t-shirt and standing outside Apple Store (Activist): Hello, sir. Do you have a few minutes for the environment?

The Logo: Sorry, I don't think I'm a good target for you.

Activist: Oh! That's too bad. May I ask why?

Logo: Well, I disagree with a lot of your positions.

Activist: Which ones in particular?

Logo: You don't support nuclear power, unless I've missed something. And weren't you involved in that plastic shopping bag ban?

Activist: Plastic bags consume huge amounts of oil, and they make up a big part of the giant trash whirlpool off Hawaii.

Logo: I thought it was something about killing seabirds.

Activist: That's right.  Seals think they're jellyfish, and seabirds get tangled in them.

Logo: But I think the numbers Greenpeace used were based on false information.

Activist: Like what?  

Logo: I'm not sure... I read it somewhere.

Activist:  Well, it's hard to ignore that giant garbage dump in the middle of the ocean. Can I sign you up for a donation?

Logo: No, I'm pretty sure that there's some misinformation going on with that, and you'd have to change your views on nuclear power... [slinks away, muttering to self.]

That's how these things often go. She's armed with talking points, and I'm unprepared to really challenge her. What I'd have liked to have said was more like this:

...

Activist: Which ones in particular?

Logo (consulting iPhone): Your support of pacifism and your opposition to nuclear power, for starters. And you've been spreading disinformation to further your political goals.  

Activist: Disinformation?

Logo: On your website's page about plastic bags, you state that "up to 1 million seabirds and 100,000 marine mammals and turtles die each year as a result of plastic debris."

Activist: That's right.

Logo: Those numbers are based on a 1987 Canadian study that estimated that 100,000 marine mammals are killed each year by discarded fishing nets. In 2002, an Australian report misstated this as plastic bags, an error that was corrected in 2006. Why's Greenpeace still passing along this bad data, and basing legislation on it?

Activist: I don't know. What's your source?

Logo: The Times of London, March 8, 2008. Would you like to see the URL?

Activist: No, that's OK.

Logo: And then there's the matter of Greenpeace's co-founder, Patrick Moore. He wrote that he quit the organization because "Greenpeace has evolved into an organization of extremism and politically motivated agendas." This was in the Wall Street Journal in 2008. Do you want the URL to that?

Activist: Not really. Look, I need to be moving on. Have a nice day.

Logo: You too!

The Logo recognizes that we're not going to convert the Greenpeace activist (as Franco notes below, there are fundamental differences at work here), but we should want to plant a seed of self-doubt. And more important, we need to be persuasive to relatively apolitical observers: the mom waiting at the crosswalk near the exchange above; the relatives at the family barbecue overhearing an exchange between you and your left-wing uncle; the neighbor who asks your honest opinion about global warming.

What this requires is a concise, compelling and credible encapsulation of our political positions. In other words, an elevator pitch. Each encapsulation should be accessible from a handheld, and it should leverage the power of a community for its creation and maintenance.

You probably see where we're going with this.

Deferring further elaboration to future posts, it makes sense to start with some pilot efforts. We can work on them together, figure out the most effective format, and use the results as templates for what we hope will be a wide range of positions (some positions will be at odds, because conservatives don't hold uniform views -- that's OK).

But first: what are some arguments you'd like to win?

Look! There's a big blue button on your Account page!

Now, you can invite your politically-aligned friends and family to try out Ricochet for three months at no charge -- we won't even ask for their credit card. Just fill in each invitee's name and email address, preview the invitation message, and we'll take it from there. Thanks to you, they'll be able to join the conversation, take sides in debates, post things on the member feed, vote up or down different articles -- you know, member stuff. And you'll be bringing in allies who can watch your back during some of the dust-ups around here.

We can't think of a better way to expand our current community while preserving its character and esprit de corps.

Busy System Admin
Joined
Feb '10

Many apologies up front.

We're still finding bugs after our software upgrade last week.  After we hit several of them, we tried reverting to the previous version of the software, but that introduced other bugs, most notably & nbsp; codes all over. So we don't really have a viable backwards "downgrade" path, and we'll have to keep the latest version of the software and work through the bugs one by one.

We wanted to let our membership know what is going on.  So here is the current list of major bugs we've found:

  • Users cannot upload a new avatar.
  • Some users cannot edit anything on their Profile except their password.  When they change their password, the system shows an error, though it does still save the new password.
  • Login problems.  These have partially been fixed, but some issues remain.
  • After logging in, you are redirected to the home page rather than the page last visited.
  • You may see & nbsp; codes in your comment when you edit it.  Ignore them for now, or replace them with spaces if they force your comment to go over the word limit.
Busy System Admin
Joined
Feb '10

Many of you who have been members of Ricochet long enough have experienced the dreaded "login problem."  Sometimes (about once a month?) the site will simply log you out and keep you out for a day or two at a time, no matter how many times you log in again.  We have not been able to reproduce it in-house long enough to debug it, and it comes and goes; it's been a bit of a ghost problem.  We love our content management software platform overall, but we were not sure if it was to blame, or if it was the interaction between other layers in the server software stack.

A month ago, a new release of the software came out.  We decided to upgrade, as we were now two versions behind.  We were hoping this would resolve this problem and others.  Thanksgiving week seemed to be a good time to do it, as traffic is a bit lighter.

After testing the upgrade on a development server all weekend, this morning I rolled out the upgrade on our production servers.  No matter how you test, however, you can never reproduce the exact conditions of a running site with a significant amount of live traffic.  We immediately found that the login problem actually became universal: no one could stay logged in, or it seemed sporadically to log you in and out.

So, first of all, apologies to all of you who had to suffer through that.  I rolled the servers back to our original version, but to really test and debug the problem, I had to switch over to the upgraded version several times throughout the day.  I finally realized I needed to upgrade another component of the server software stack, after which the problem seems to have gone away.

Our server is now running on the latest version of the content management software, and the login problem seems to be resolved.  We hope it is resolved for good, but do please let us know if you run across it again.

There are many things for which each of us can be thankful if we care to think about it.  My job as architect, sysadmin and lead developer of this site is hard at times, but I mostly love my work and am very thankful for this opportunity.  I hope each of you is somehow enriched by Ricochet.

Thanks for being readers and members!  You are the reason we are here, and the reason I get to work on such a great site every day.

Happy Thanksgiving!

The Logo
November 19, 2010

Let’s say you drop in on Ricochet over morning coffee, read a few conversations, add a comment or two, then go on with your day. Later, you come back to see what’s new, and to see how the conversations you read earlier have progressed.

If you’re like us, this involves a test of memory:

“Let’s see, did Duane Oyen’s post have 53 or 57 comments?”
“I did read Claire’s post, ‘Dressing for Turkey’… didn’t I? And was it a recipe or fashion tip?”
“What was the last comment I read on that post by Marybeth Hicks?”

You don’t need more things to remember, do you? Well, we’re here to help.

For starters, we’re working on adding New Comments Indicators to conversations: little, bright orange numbers that appear right after the total number of comments. So if you read a conversation in the morning that has only 23 comments and then in the afternoon it has 35 comments, you’ll see “Comment (35)(12)” at the bottom of the post, with the 12 in bright orange.

Note that we’re not basing these calculations on when you last visited the site, but on when you last opened each conversation. This, I’m told, involves some nifty technical gymnastics. And we have to implement this so it doesn’t delay loading the main information on your page. The net result is that (a) you’ll immediately know if there are any new comments; and, (b) you’ll see which conversations you’ve already read. Eventually, clicking on the New Comments Indicator will take you to the page where the new comments appear, with the new comments highlighted in some manner.

This feature will be restricted to members for mainly technical reasons: we need some way to identify each reader so we can calculate and serve up all these customized numbers, and we see cookies as presenting reliability and performance issues. So, users have to be logged in, and the only mechanism we have for this is through membership.

We have other features planned to help navigation, but I’ll save their discussion for another post.

We changed the name of the "All Conversations" tab to "Main Feed" because it had become inaccurate: our home page no longer has all the conversations; some of them are in the Member Feed section.

That said, the Main Feed won't change much, and it's our intention to keep it as Ricochet's center stage. Over time, we expect to see about 60% of the conversations initiated by contributors (it was 100% until a few weeks ago), with the remaining 40% divvied up between conversations initiated by partners (like this), news items (like this), and, of course, members (like this).

As the above Inside Ricochet box suggests, Ricochet is based on the premise that conservatives have been consistently mis-portrayed by some of the loudest voices in our culture: broadcast news celebrities, editors at urban newspapers, activists, entertainers, university humanities professors, etc. Not all of them, of course -- the Wall Street Journal and Fox News are notable exceptions -- but the sense one gets from watching SNL, seeing a movie, reading the New York Times, listening to NPR or getting a BA degree is that conservatives are ignorant at best, evil at worst.

Well, our experience has been the complete opposite. Everywhere we've looked, in every industry and community, in offices and neighborhoods across the country, we've encountered smart, clever, savvy right-of-center men and women – accomplished, thoughtful voices from the conservative end of things.

And that's what Ricochet's about. Revealing the broadly-conservative community as we know it to be, and making sure we're able to keep out the few bad apples who give conservatism a bad name. Since launching a few months ago, we've been enormously gratified at the quality and civility of the conversations on site, and now we want to start giving our members a greater voice.

The member feed page we’re introducing today is one step in that direction. We'll add more to this in the coming months, so stay tuned.

Busy System Admin
Joined
Feb '10

We're launching a new sub-page on Ricochet.com-- "Inside Ricochet." If you're curious about where we are going with the site, about upcoming features and known issues, and any other Ricochet news, this is the place to come!

Upcoming Features

Private Messaging

Status: Completed

Simple, private member-to-member messaging.

Keywords / Tags

Status: Not Started

The ability for Members and Contributors alike to add keywords or tags to their Conversations. This should allow people to find them more easily. In addition, this will allow us to place a list of "Related Conversations" at the end of each Conversation, generated automatically from the similarity in keywords between conversations.

Loading
RicochetMug

Fact: Coffee always tastes better from a center-right mug.

Get your Ricochet merchandise from Printfection.com now!

Start your shopping here!

Help support Ricochet by making your purchases through our Amazon links.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In