But didn't watch it and don't feel like spending an hour and a half watching it on YouTube, have a look at my rough transcript. The goal was to capture the gist of each question and the candidates response. A few of my takes on the answers, or lack of answers may have slipped in.
Overall I think it is at least worthwhile to be familiar with the content of the debate. However, I thought the questions were pretty mediocre and the debate was not very spirited. It is easy to see why Romney is one of the top candidates, he is able to sidestep questions and make a rosy speech instead. Does this make him a bad candidate in my view? Not necessarily, but maybe...Governor Huntsman was the same way, except my impression of him was that he would be a terrible person to nominate. He did not come off as being able to answer questions authoritatively, nor did he have the hard-to-describe-but-you-know-it-when-you-see-it presence of a leader.