And Most of Our Athletes Will be Working in Something Other Than a Sports Colloquium

If you would like to see what modern university presidents think about defending academic freedom, let me submit the following story that is running through the sports economist community.

The NCAA on Monday pulled the plug on its Scholarly Colloquium, canceling financial support for future academic conferences and announcing plans to wind down its investment in the forum’s scholarly journal, following a sometimes-contentious six-year run.

The news—delivered by James L. Isch, the NCAA’s chief operating officer—came during a meeting of the colloquium’s Executive Board on Monday night, just hours before this year’s colloquium was set to begin, on Tuesday morning.

Citing poor attendance at the annual conference, a lack of profitability of the journal, and a failure to influence public policy, Mr. Isch said the NCAA planned to redirect its investment into “targeted research” that its member colleges wanted, according to academic leaders present at the meeting.

Emphasis mine. When academics attend an academic conference, they expect to have the freedom to present materials they prepare in an honest inquiry into the truth. The presidents had been more explicit in December, saying they wanted “directed research.” As Dean Post of Yale Law School states in the second article, the NCAA is using a corporate model to use its research dollars rather than an academic one.

As you might guess, the research done by the colloquium isn’t all that flattering of the organization:

But as Mr. [Wallace] Renfro [NCAA policy advisor] watched presentations at last year’s colloquium, which focused on changes the NCAA has made in its academic policies in recent years, he did not see a variety of perspectives.

“I was hearing virtually one voice being sung by a number of people … and it was relatively critical of the NCAA’s academic-reform effort,” he said. “I don’t care whether it was critical or not, but I care about whether there are different perspectives presented.”

He became even more concerned when he learned of the theme for next month’s colloquium, which is to be held in conjunction with the association’s annual convention: “Economic Inequality Within the NCAA.”

“It’s certainly provocative. And it may be pejorative,” Mr. Renfro said. “But it clearly does not represent a notion that you’re going to examine financial differences. It says you’re going to talk about financial inequalities.”

After looking at some of the titles of the research to be presented in January, he became concerned that the conference was beginning to look ideological.

I work on a campus where there are all kinds of conferences that have a particular ideological viewpoint. I do not recall a university president or any other administrator, ever, expressing concern for different viewpoints. Why now? 

It is the NCAA’s right to fund or not fund research it sees fit. But all of its gauzy, feel-good advertising about student-athletes is meant to build a brand based on amateurism, with amateurs that spend most of their days in academic pursuits (even if those pursuits are sometimes less than rigorous.)  This is simply the latest display of the hypocrisy with which the NCAA operates.

  1. Pseudodionysius

    College athletes are the slave laborers and trireme rowers to feed the corrupt monolith that is the NCAA.

  2. EJHill

    What the NCAA should do and won’t:

    • Restrict scholarships to true financial need

    • Restrict coaches and athletic directors salaries to 3 times the median academic salary on campus
    • Prohibit school or conference owned sports networks
    • Create a uniform stipend fee payable to athletes including paying for family travel to a maximum of two NCAA-sanctioned events per sports season
    • Create an NCAA student bereavement office that would pay for emergency travel for family emergencies. 
  3. Whiskey Sam

    Do away with athletic scholarships.  Make professional sports pay for their own farm system.  Problem solved.

  4. EJHill

    If the NCAA were truly serious about it’s stated mission all college sports would look and operate like Division III.

    Their catch-all hammer is “the lack of institutional control.” But can anyone name a D-I university president that really has control of his athletic department? Maybe inside the “mid-majors” but certainly nowhere else.

    Why are schools/conferences premitted to own television networks? (The Pac-12 Network is 100% conference owned, Fox controls 51% of the Big Ten Network and the much rumored emergence of an SEC Network is likely to be run with or by ESPN.)

    Why are schools allowed to jump conferences like a hooker jumps beds in a brothel? Oh, yeah – same reason.

Want to comment on stories like these? Become a member today!

You'll have access to:

  • All Ricochet articles, posts and podcasts.
  • The conversation amongst our members.
  • The opportunity share your Ricochet experiences.

Join Today!

Already a Member? Sign In