danny b's Profile

Name:
danny b
Joined:
Apr 2, 2011

Recent Comments

danny b

to scare a generation of kids in order to manipulate them later into BS legislative measures ;D... like taxing exhalations, and regulating light bulbs

danny b

Colorado as a 'toss up' is being generous. We're increasingly more and more Blue here, even after the mid-terms....

danny b

Joseph Stanko: Ursula, I think one factor you've overlooked is the American love of the underdog story.  In a rigid class-based society if you are born into the upper class you are born to a live of wealth and privlidge, while if you are born into the working class you have little or no chance to improve your lot in life.  America has wide gaps between rich and poor but also tremendous social mobility, the "rags to riches" story really is possible, with hard work and a great idea you can found a business and become the next Bill Gates or Sam Walton.

Sam Walton · Apr 17 at 3:50pm

Great post, Joseph.  The A's are beloved.  The Yankees do what they do within the rules, but where's the fun in rooting for the team that's there every year?  Let's just all be Lakers, Patriots, Steelers, and Celtic fans, too then.

danny b

If you love the Yankees, you have to love the Pirates and Royals more....being that they are the Yankees farm teams.   You gotta crush the little and suck him dry, squash him (if you will) for your own success.  Yankees got the best players money can buy, we have the best government money can buy?  Is that where this line of thought goes?

danny b

Jaydee_007:  I hate to rain on your parade, but they didn't 'did it' at all.

What they did today was "Non Binding"    Spell that Symbolic.

I'm waiting until they pass it for real before celebrating.  Somehow I think it's going to be watered down, and compromised away before it even gets over to the senate.

And, OH, By the Way, NPR, NEA and CPB are STILL Funded!

Whimps! · Apr 16 at 12:56am

Edited on Apr 16 at 01:00 am

yea.  I'm with this sentiment.   That sham/scam that was the '11 budget.  The President's 'speech' the other day.  Boehner as 'leader.  Moral victories don't count for anything.  We're getting hosed.  All I can hear is Pat Caddell saying, "Republicans are soooo stupid!"  And now we're supposed to feel good and optimistic about this? Come on.

Seriously, NYT is gnashing it's teeth.  And?  The House had to pass just to keep the base from going medieval them.  So, I pose the question, what exactly did they do? 

danny b

Do NOT count on Colorado.  Mid-terms, asides from some rural districts going to Repubs...everything else went blue.   Ballot amendments weren't even close.  Hickenlooper got elected after saying that most of the state, outside of Denver and Boulder, is a bunch of backwoods gay-haters.  The Denver Mayoral election is in a few weeks, guess what? there's like 9 varietys of Democrats on the ballot and Zero Republicans.   Our senators are Bennet and Udall, need more? Colorado loves it's gov't cheese....

danny b

you know if 'Fight Club' where it's asked, "If you could fight one person in history, who would it be?"  I got my answer, w/o hesitation after yesterday's "speech."

danny b

Diane Ellis, Ed.

Kenneth:

However, I wouldn't put it past Boehner to cave in on "tax simplifications" which result in "revenue enhancements".  · Apr 12 at 12:30pm

If we could indeed get a major set of simplifications in the tax code, I think I'd be willing to pay slightly more.  The whole process gives me such a headache, and I paid a really hefty sum to get someone else to do my taxes this year.  Fewer brackets, fewer loopholes, eliminate the AMT, and make the process simple enough for an ordinary person to figure out without too much hassle. · Apr 12 at 1:42pm

I'm with Kenneth's cynicism and Diane's simplification.  The Anarchy of Laws.  Damned if you, damned if you don't.   Our system is not for simplification at this point. Please, let me know if i'm wrong on that.

danny b

George Savage: In 2007, the federal government spent $2.72 trillion and incurred a budget deficit of about $160 billion.  By 2010, spending had ballooned by $1 trillion, nearly 37 percent, with a whopping, unsustainable $1.3 trillion deficit.  This all gets worse in 2011, with a projected $1.65 trillion deficit facing us and $1 trillion-dollar-plus shortfalls as far as the eye can see.

The Democrats have now baked the failed $1 trillion "stimulus" into the budget baseline.  This is horrendous, unsustainable, and given enough time our climbing debt-to-GDP ratio will destroy our economy, force growth-destroying European levels of taxation, or both.

And with the notable exception of Rep. Ryan, Republican leaders seemingly cannot make the case to the American people, cannot use the tools at their disposal to underscore the severity of the problem, and won't even stand up and insist on an honest 1 percent reduction in spending.

· Apr 13 at 1:58pm

Edited on Apr 13 at 02:09 pm

Exactly. Why change when the opposition is this weak? or already dismissed the mid term elections....

danny b

oh, and, it's 38 billion-ish in "cuts" from a budget that never existed. 

danny b

Robert Promm: Peter,

Remember last week when you were so concerned about the political effects of a shut down?  It's sophistry of this ilk that makes the shut down mandatory. · Apr 13 at 1:02pm

Couldn't agree more.  The Barnes, Brooks, Rove media types are going to sink us along with the democrats.

Levin wasn't three minutes into his show last night saying that many conservatives media types got 'snookered' by Boehner.  Where's Pat Caddel to call Republicans stupid some more. They are.  But, unfortunately they are the only vessel for non-lefty types to vote for. 

How many times will the Right fall into this trap and then demand answers?!

The old 'drain the swamp' phrase has a whole new meaning these days.  Stop with the old guard bs already, it's destructive, and stupid.

danny b
David Limbaugh: Kenneth. Thank you very much. I'm glad you're here too. And you're right about he money. I asked Peter for a raise -- from a nickel a week to a quarter. He's taken it under advisement. I'm betting on a pocket veto. Maybe we could unionize? · Apr 12 at 8:07pm

I'm glad both of ya'll are here.  I joined this site just for the sake of busting Peter's view on the budget, and Rob Long's for that matter.  We're in it....deep.  We can't make the same mistakes that lefties made with Barack and start feeling all good about Boehner or any other politician.  No more status quo, or 'stay the course's' and such, but, we have a new reality, a new America....i.e. new things to deal with in new ways.  I hate to quote Eddie Vedder, but a Progressive friend of mine does often, "...i'll keep takin' punches 'til their will grows tired..."  

they're waiting for us (conservatives) to cave...

Welcome to the New Fight. No Quitting, no playing nice and no crappy deals w/ democrats in DC.

danny b

go to youtube and type in 'male feminism'....? 

danny b

I'm with David.  The 'political capital' arguement is tired.  The stakes are too high.  We conservative types need to know that our Reps in DC will fight for us.  Alot of us are just waiting for these guys to do 'business as usual'...cut yet another bad deal ('tax cuts' for unemployment extension).

David Limbaugh

 But let me state it again: I will be disappointed if they cave, but I will not take my ball and go home. I will remain behind them, trying to help embolden them not to cave on the Ryan plan, which I think caving on the first will make them more, not less likely to do.

This. We can't whine about political courage and then just give them a budget they punted on anyway.

1000p'cuts

I'm pretty sure I'm not alone here.  But, this is why I'm having a hard time not being cynical about things....specifically Ryan's budget proposal, and I don't want to be.  Because, soon after, this kind of junk gets fed into the news cycle.   Ryan's proposal might be the best thing i've ever seen in my life come out of D.C. (I'm 32).  So, to counter some serious reforms, 'we' get to even talk about *uckabee and Trump.  Seriously?  What's next? How the GOP compromises and special deals/backdoor deals the 2012 budget to death?  Please, stop the insanity :)

1000p'cuts

Peter Robinson

Kenneth: It disguises the magnitude of the near-term crisis - $400 billion out of a $1.7 trillion deficit is just the slightly slower boat to hell. · Apr 4 at 5:00pm

Edited on Apr 04 at 05:01 pm

Slow boat to hell?  Doesn't look that way, Kenneth. The Wall Street Journal just posted Paul Ryan's op-ed piece for tomorrow's paper.  There's a limit to how much I can quote, but I figure the fair use doctrine will permit me to reproduce the accompanying chart.  Ryan assumes the economy will start growing again--that and other assumptions certainly deserve scrutiny.  But his proposal actually reduces federal indebtedness.  

A slow boat?  Yes.  But not to hell.  To heaven. · Apr 4 at 5:13pm

That's a whole lot of assumptions...

for starters, like those receiving entitlements are just going to give them up because this budget proposal says so.  I guess this budget proposal is a start, but it's a long road to 'not-heaven'.  I'm not about to take yours or the WSJ's word for it.  Been burned too many times...

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In