Bio

Born in Italy, orphaned, and so passed around the family until I landed in Venice and then at 16 years of age whisked off to Vienna by my dear mentor and teacher Florian Gassmann. Made a bit of splash in the capital where I wrote a few dozen operas and some other music.  Married a rich German wife, had a pretty mistress (fine singer) and lots of children.  In the meantime I conducted, traveled, and composed some more.  I really loved Vienna, there I enjoyed music, sweets, pastries, and good conversation with my many dear friends, men like Metastasio, Gluck, and the Emperor Joseph II, that is until I ran into a little person who shall remain nameless.  He cause me some headaches, then he went away.  Died, tragically. Back to the old grind again what with teaching, conducting, and composing while having the distinct displeasure of watching the Holy Roman Empire fall.  Continued teaching those young fellows: you know Ludwig, Igance, Franz, and Franz. In my later years I concentrated on church music; promptly retired at 73 and died a few years later.  Sadly outlived my mistress, wife, son, and two daughters.  A full time of it really.


This section of St. Salieri's profile is hidden.


People Following St. Salieri

This section of St. Salieri's profile is hidden.


Conversations St. Salieri is Following

This section of St. Salieri's profile is hidden.


Conversations St. Salieri has Started (11)

Display starting at 11 of 11 user conversations

St. Salieri's Profile

St. Salieri
Name:
St. Salieri
Hometown:
Legnago, Italy
Joined:
Feb 7, 2011

Recent Comments

St. Salieri

I think that in 300 years from now when the chapter is written about the music of the 20th century, film scores are going to be part of the meat and potatoes, as will jazz, ragtime, rock, rap, country, and world music.  Much of the "important/artistic" music and composers of the century will go down into the footnotes with about two dozen exceptions mostly composers working between 1900 and 1940, and there will be lengthy discussions of men and women whose works were ignored in our century (as well as the 20th) for being too tonal, conservative, and "romantic".

St. Salieri

Exactly Joseph, why indeed!  Great music is great music - good music is good music - and somebody likes bad music...so humility.

Melody, really great melodies whether written by the Beatles, Irving Berlin, or Mozart are damned hard - and praise be to whom ever creates one.  What you do with a great melody, well, that's where it gets interesting.

Joseph Stanko

St. Salieri

I now understand why many great conductors would get irate at critics who would disparage Johann Strauss Jr., Tchaikovsky  or Copland.   You try writing the Blue Danube Waltz or the Nutcracker or Rodeo and then get back to me

Forget the technical difficulty, how can anyone not enjoy those three pieces of music?  And why disparage someone for composing beautiful music that so many people evidently love? · 8 minutes ago

St. Salieri

Um Red Feline...I don't know where you base your understanding of church history on, but it is just horribly inaccurate and sounds like a low church anti-catholic Sunday school pamphlet from the early 1900's.  The Kirk acted as the de-facto parliament in Scotland well into the 18th century, (I would argue into the 1830's) it was one of the reasons James VI was so happy to become James I of England.  The idea that there was separation of state and church in early modern Scotland is ridiculous.  Your other assertions about the RC and early Christianity is just inaccurate and you should temper it because you are making strong accusations with little or no factual basis.  Plus you contradict yourself by asserting that by being a Catholic you were a traitor to the Scottish nation, (many highland clans never converted) so wouldn't this be a conflation of church and state.

Signed,

Son of Presbyterian elder, lover and frequent traveler to Scotland, Calvinist Anglican, author of a historical_thesis on the Scots-Irish Presbyterian_culture of_western_Pennsylvania.

Red Feline

Katie O

...    John Knox was for separation of "Church of Rome"and state, not church and state. 

St. Salieri

St. Salieri:

Even the professionals disagree, that is its joy and its frustration.

Especially the professionals, I should think.

If you're passionate enough about music to make a living at it, I imagine you must feel musical likes and dislikes rather intensely. Not that you can always afford to let it show. · 2 hours ago

Well, yes, we often DO disagree, and passionately  but at least I can sometimes understand why or how we came to disagree.  With those who are less knowledgable not so much (oftentimes) - hence the frustration.
Then there is the frustration because when we want to agree with a critic, conductor, performer or scholar we like or respect it can be infureating.  HOW can you hold that position, you should KNOW better.  

I now understand why many great conductors would get irate at critics who would disparage Johann Strauss Jr., Tchaikovsky  or Copland.   You try writing the Blue Danube Waltz or the Nutcracker or Rodeo and then get back to me...at the same time, I find the music I love - I really love in a way that I never used to love - love increases, hate decreases.  

St. Salieri

Yes...and no...  There are details and insights I'm totally lacking in, but to hear people who are not musicians or who are not thorough-going musicians discuss music is a source of both joy and utter frustration.  I'm very glad to hear their enthusiasm, shocked by their opinions and their reasoning, and assertions.  Mrs. Salieri and I sometimes discuss after a concert how we sometimes miss the freshness of music - the newness, the exploration of something unknown, perhaps that is why I love Salieri, he and his work is still unknown, I'll hear it - if at all - for the first time in my life, sometimes in anyone's in over 200 years.  At the same time I wouldn't trade my knowledge and ability to appreciate and enjoy music at this level for anything.  

Midget Faded Rattlesnake

On the other hand, it's fun to hear about others' tastes, no? Especially if their enthusiasm introduces you to something you end up liking.

St. Salieri:

Even the professionals disagree, that is its joy and its frustration.

Especially the professionals, I should think.

St. Salieri

Well, it is part of her dear set of vocal mannerisms - Cecilia is one of those singers you love, love to hate, or hote to lave...personally, I think she allowed herself too much of it in this performance, and she was singing a little out of her range; but, her connection and complete accord with the underlying emotional sense of the text and the way Salieri approached it makes for a dramatically convincing rendition, one that is in my opinion beautiful, if flawed.

Midget Faded Rattlesnake

St. Salieri: Oh, and I can recommend an unjustly neglected composer to explore, especially if you love opera...

[walks away whistling slowly while looking up at the sky]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzYitR4TFAI

You sly dog!

Is it just really low in her register, or is that breathiness for dramatic effect? · 8 hours ago

St. Salieri

Oh, and I can recommend an unjustly neglected composer to explore, especially if you love opera...

[walks away whistling slowly while looking up at the sky]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzYitR4TFAI

Edited on May 17, 2013 at 5:54pm
St. Salieri

As a professional musician (classical), I find this discussion fascinating.  So often as I've read the comments I've wanted to respond with a: "but..., wrong,...no,...,because,...it's not,...perhaps".  Then I've stopped myself.  I could demonstrate some erudition or pedantic snottiness, but to what end.  I agree with Duke Ellington - "If it sounds good, it is good" - to the individual listener. 

If we start to talk about deep artistic merits, technical mastery, or historic and/or cultural influence and so forth on a more technical level, then there is someplace to go, but we need to leave our personal predilections and taste a side to go there.

I think the problem (if it IS a problem) is that music is music.  We love it, we hate it, we go meh.

Even the professionals disagree, that is its joy and its frustration.

St. Salieri

In fact, one wonders if this is how she rejuvenates her political career to some degree, by throwing the President under the bus...hmm...what would Bill do?

The King Prawn: Now that the truth is out there she can testify under oath with her recollection "refreshed" and tell the truth even if it completely contradicts her earlier testimony. And, she can pin it all on Obama who is done politically, so she still gets out from under this thing. · 2 minutes ago
St. Salieri

I would also agree with this - with a caveat - it should be our job as adults to find ways to make others feel special and not except the same in return.

tabula rasa: Celebrating birthdays for adults is OK, but when we become adults we should ratchet the expectations way down (to somewhere near zero).  I take my advice on this issue from Dave Barry's classic "19 Rules That Took Me 50 Years to Learn."  This is no. 15:

There comes a time when you should stop expecting other people to make a big deal about your birthday. That time is age 11.

On the other hand, if it's a good excuse to go to dinner, I'm for it. · 2 hours ago

Edited 2 hours ago

St. Salieri

Frankly, get over getting old.  I hate how our culture denigrates aging.  The age we live to is either arbitrary or in some sense fulfills God's purposes, either way it is something to celebrate.

I think we should celebrate birthdays, all birthdays, they are a reminder that we are each a unique creation of the creator, fashioned in his image, and we are of great worth.  So to celebrate a birthday is to recognize that the individual being has worth, and that worth points to the source, even if you don't believe that, then at least consider that each life is special and unique, the life itself is worth celebrating as a gift, we have the chance to tell those we know and love - even those at the office that we don't really "love" that they are special people, and having something to celebrate is important.  

That our culture wants to make it a materialistic mess should not deter us, but spurr us to make them occasions to show love and gratitude.

Plus there's the whole cake thing, not to mention ice cream, best if home-made in a hand-cranked freezer - did_I_mention_mine is coming up!

St. Salieri

I couldn't but help think of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFjttC_AGsU

DrewInWisconsin

Fred Cole

It's that I don't want to have some silly ol' law getting in the way of their fun.  That's exactly it.  You got me pegged.  It's just good old fashioned hedonism.  That's the only standard that I live life by.  Damn, do you ever have my number!

For what it's worth, if I believed there was no objective morality, then the only logical way to live one's life would be as a complete hedonist. To get every ounce of joy and pleasure out of existence before taking the final dirt nap. I would act only as it pleased me to do. If there is no objective morality, that is the only reasonable thing to do. · 3 hours ago

St. Salieri

The best engraving of moi (Antonio Salieri)  in retirement....circa 1821.

The name comes from the closing lines of the film version of Amadeus.

"I am the patron saint of mediocracy"...

I sentiment I can relate to, and I am a great admirer of the real and far more interesting non-murderous Salieri, though the dramatic version has kept the other alive in the public eye.  Plus the drama/film is a generally interesting exploration of what hate will do to a person's soul.

St. Salieri

Exactly!  Which is why I find comparisons to the Revolution so odious, both those made in 1861 and now - by all rights, the slaves should have been leading the revolution, which is why the south was incensed at former slaves and free blacks serving in uniform, and why on multipal occasions surrendering black troops were slaughtered, as well as their white officers.  When the south finally decided to arm and free slaves who would fight for them they couldn't even muster a company and the war was all but lost.

Joseph Stanko

St. Salieri

Douglas

The South was damn near uniform in their desire to secede. The southern states had the overwhelming support of their peoples. Quite a different issue. 

This is not true - look at the returns for the votes to secede, even at the state conventions only South Carolina voted unanimously.  Even indiehardstates of the deep south people voted against it.

And even if whiteSouth Carolinians were overwhelmingly in favor, they were only about half the population of the state.  Their slaves were not represented at the convention. · 3 hours ago

St. Salieri

Post 152 continued, responding to 148:

4. continued, The ability of all commanders, or willingness to fulfill these orders is certainly up for debate and investigation, but it was often fulfilled as could be hoped under the pressures and reality of war.

However, it was the problem of fugitive slaves, the so-called contrabands, and the rabid resistance of some southerners that lead to a change in federal policy.  Sometimes it was local commanders acting in defiance of orders, and sometimes pro-Union southerns suffered unjustly, as did some pro-southern civilians.  War is hell and should be avoided at all costs because of the "slippage" that occurs when passions and violence are systamatically unleashed.

Something the men in the south who precipitated a war because they fairly lost an election should have thought of before they did what they did.

Your final point - slavery wasn't dying off and if you read what southerners actual wrote at the time 1850-1865, those that favored slavery were not going to go gentle into that good night.  The war had little to do with states rights, it was simply the argument to protect slavery.  Southerners would happily violate both state_laws, federal_laws_and_states_rights_when_it_interfered_with_their_proslavery_stance.

St. Salieri

From 148 Continued:

2. Not likely as long as the labor and demand were cost effective, it would be the war that pushed the cotton production into global high-gear.  Also there would have been a likely expansion of slavery into other industries and production sectors as cotton became less profitable, additional defacto slavery continued into the 1920's with cotton still the primary source of indebtedness of black share-croppers.

3. The fugitive slave act was enforced because of pressure from southern congressmen, and because of the high percentage of southerners in federal posts able to exert leverage, additional there was a large segment of pro-South northerners so this is a moot point, it was enforced except when local people, often no friends to abolition or free blacks were appalled by the tactics of those in the process of carrying out the operations, and finally the other side of the state rights coin.  Many northern states enacted state laws to try to protect run-away or ex-slaves.

4. This is also not true, in the opening months and years of the war, federal orders were very particular to attempt to protect southern property, including slaves. Continued

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In