Bio

Richard Rushfield is a LA based writer, journalist and observer of the entertainment and cultural landscape. His writings can be found at RushfieldBabylon.com or on Twitter @richardrushfield


People Richard Rushfield is Following

End of Richard Rushfield's followed conversation feed



People Following Richard Rushfield (2)



Conversations Richard Rushfield is Following (4)



Conversations Richard Rushfield has Started (12)

Display starting at 12 of 12 user conversations

Richard Rushfield's Profile

Richard Rushfield
Name:
Richard Rushfield
Hometown:
Venice, CA
Joined:
Apr 8, 2011

Recent Comments

Richard Rushfield

As many note, his reviews were a mixed bad, and his politics could be pretty obnoxious, but I think he shoved criticism in a general direction, which made a huge difference, and that is his contribution.

Another thing, I've enjoyed in reading the obits on him. These days critics are mostly judged by their slams; who can write the sharpest, funniest most devastating take down. Ebert certainly didnt hold back when he disliked a movie; he felt too passionately about the medium to give anyone who used it a free pass. But his was never the gleeful hachet job....Perhaps the only critic around these days whose best quotes would not be from their slams.

Richard Rushfield
mikesixes:  I don't see how unhinged ranting from people attacking Clint Eastwood for being old or claiming it's racist to be from Michigan can do anything but make Romney look good by comparison. · 9 minutes ago

Couldnt agree more. He's directed the backlash twitteratis to a target they will look nothing but pathetic attacking.

Richard Rushfield

Thats a beautiful reflection James.  I truly feel as though something great has vanished from this world.  Not just in his great accomplishments, but in every day he abided as the most famous man on the planet, abstaining utterly from the celebrity culture, he quietly set down a challenge for all to aspire to.  

My reflections I posted here:  http://rushfieldbabylon.com/post/30229378585/there-have-been-two-great-epic-scale-adventures-of

Richard Rushfield

That is fine. I like Rushfiekd better.

ParisParamus: Sorry, Rushfield (can't edit on my phone). · 2 hours ago
Richard Rushfield
Trace Urdan: Veep is considered bullet-proof level good? Really? It's put me to sleep -- literally -- on three separate occasions. It's not caused me to laugh out loud once (maybe I've smiled.) I keep checking it out because it's only 30 minutes and "has good bones," but bullet-proof? Really? · 4 hours ago

Julia Louis Dreyfus' comic skills are absolutely unquestionable.  I could watch her read Craigslist.  And Veep is funnier than Craigslist.

Richard Rushfield

Forever will remain the one person in my life who did not understand the concept of fear.  No one ever told him he wasn't allowed to be a journalist, or he wasn't allowed to take on establishment icons all by himself so he just went and did it. The more people told him that he was crazy or out of line for having the beliefs he did, the more he loved to make them look at the limits of their own thinking.  And how much fun he had doing it..talking to anyone about the things he felt passionate about; whether it was someone with him or against him, he just lit up with joy every single time.
It's just impossible to believe that such a spirit is just like that, gone.  So devastated for Susie and the kids. But his courage will always be the standard for me, that memory will never ever die.

Richard Rushfield

I wouldn't get your hopes up for Hollywood coming around on Mrs. Thatcher.  There's a biopic on her starring Meryl Streep coming out at the end of the year that is sure to be much more in the spirit of Oliver Stone's Nixon than Henry King's heroic Wilson
Very few critics have seen The Iron Lady yet, but here's a little taste from one who has:

she (Streep) digs even deeper, revealing the tragic vulnerabilities of a woman who pretended publicly not to have any. We see her in old age battling dementia and the ghost of her doting husband Dennis who won't quit haunting her. That means we see her age dramatically – complete with an impressive makeup job that makes her look pale and withered in her 80s. 

Brace yourself for the Hollywood version still to come.

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor
Denise Moss: Very interesting take, Richard.  There was a time when it was impossible to break into the comedy ranks unless you were from Harvard.  Conan O'Brian is a Harvard Lampoon graduate, as were many of the other Simpson's writers who ultimately become show runners.  And forget it if you were a woman...this was a boys' club.  That's why I cheer for Tina Fey's success, even if I don't like her politics.  

The sad thing for me in the comedy world of today is how many of the people who do not come from the Lampoon world fall into that voice, Fey being chief among them.  There are some other vital alternate routes into comedy - Second City, UCB - for instance that are more theatricalc, less carrerist. But once get to the ranks of SNL or the "smart" sitcoms..in the Arrested Development lineage, that voice dominates all.

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor
CJRun: I agree with some of the themes expressed here and would concur that the South Park exception shouldn't be overlooked.  There is another, glaring, exception that seems to be, somehow, defying the odds by making money, getting laughs, and doing a smidge of enlightening.  To elite critical disdain. · Nov 13 at 7:09am

South Park is a truly great exception in this era. As I would argue is Beavis and Butthead which doesn't have carry hint of Harvard smarm.  Comedy is not dead, just hiding out in various corners

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor

Blue State Blues

Grendel

It is impossible to imagine anyone wanting John Belushi to host an event for their campaign, nor any of the off-kilter, reckless comedy talents of the day.  It is impossible to imagine turning to the cast and crew of Caddyshack for their views on global warming or health care reform.   But that is where their predecessors have placed themselves.

I don't understand this paragraph.  Whom does their refer to?  Who are the predecessors? · Nov 12 at 8:03pm

I think he meant successors, rather than predecessors.

"Their" refers to "anyone."  I think he meant "any politician who wishes to be taken seriously as a candidate for office." · Nov 12 at 10:10pm

Precisely...that successor/predecessor thing...So easy to mix up in the heat of a post.  My apologies though

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor
anon_academic: Traditionally conservatism went along with the idea that there were objective cultural achievements, both canonical and new, and these deserved society's respect in an aspirational sense even if they failed to attract a large audience. 

I agree with you completely on this. Im all for a cultural hierarchy that is willing to say Beethoven is better than K$sha. I mourn however, the loss of a vital center in our culture. There was a time as recently as a couple decades ago when you could say the highest rated shows on tv were the best.  That clearly has past, but what makes me sad is that with the collapse of that center, there is no conversation between the poles.  We don't have to say NCIS is the same as Mad Men, but for the media to just ignore the culture of the vast majority of Americans paints it into a corner.  If NCIS is awful, make that case. But instead they tell Americans, your pastimes are not even worthy of noting in passing.

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor

Beasley: While I see your point, my response is still just a to sigh.

Undoubtedly, part of my lack of sympathy is that I find Mad Men to be very engaging and have never had the slightest inclination to flip the dial over to an episode of NCIS. (in its defense my grandparents never miss an episode.)

I guess it simply strikes me as more of an instance of correlation than collusion.  · Nov 9 at 4:00am

I am in fact with you, and with the media's preferences, and those of my socioeconomic/urban demographic.  I do love Mad Men and have watched NCIS exactly once, so this was not to imply otherwise. I am however aware that I am indulging a taste that is very specific to me demo. My point was that the entertainment media in choosing one over the other, doesnt seem aware anymore that they are making that choice but seems to have forgotten that a broader culture - for better or worse - even exists.

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor
flownover: They both started well, but I think the aging process affects their fanbase as much as their output. Hollywood is basically bereft of new ideas. It's the story ,not the director. 

It is interesting that the aging process does not really affect their subjects.  One issue never touched on in Spielberg's work is aging itself, let alone mortality.  It remains in both the serious and potboiler version, an 11 year old's worldview.  Not inappropriate for the official spokesman of our times.

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor

Robert Lux: Spielberg is "brave" with respect to evil that's gone and "history," but embraces moral equivalence and cowardice with respect to the here and now. This nicely sums up liberalism's notion of morality as determined by history (i.e., historical progress or progressivism), rather than morality made intelligible in light of some unchanging ground (God or nature) beneath our changing experiences. · Nov 7 at 1:24pm

Edited on Nov 07 at 01:30 pm

It is absolutely true.  Modern liberalism loves the heroic ideal of fighting enemies, but sees that as belong to a distant simplistic time and today's world as much more "complex"

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor

Tim Groseclose: Richard, welcome to Ricochet! 

Great post!!

I love your never-show-anger advice.  Maybe the greatest illustration ever of this was William Hung.  (See here.)  Despite Simon Cowell's insults, all he said was "I already gave my best, and I have no regrets at all."  If he entered politics, I'd totally vote for him. · Nov 6 at 3:48pm

We should also note that William Hung after a thrilling singing career, it is reported has just gone to work for the LA County Sheriff's Dept as technical crime analyst. So maybe he was showing the solid grounding of a no nonsense conservative all along!

Richard Rushfield, Guest Contributor

Tim Groseclose: Richard, welcome to Ricochet! 

Great post!!

I love your never-show-anger advice.  Maybe the greatest illustration ever of this was William Hung.  (See here.)  Despite Simon Cowell's insults, all he said was "I already gave my best, and I have no regrets at all."  If he entered politics, I'd totally vote for him. · Nov 6 at 3:48pm

Many thanks and good to see our friends in the academy find time to build such impressive knowledge of the finer things in cultural life.

There's a slight cavea however - having interviewed Mr. Hung, he really does seem to believe that he gave outstanding performances and that his fan base is completely unironic.  One contestant who made it to 4th place in his season told me how when he was waiting to audition, he was terrified that he wasn't nearly good enough to win.  Sitting next to him however, was the man who later became famous for his breathtaking tuneless rendition of Let My People Go.  While the actual contender sat trembling in fear, he says his neighbor was cool as a cucumber - knowing for certain that he was going to win.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In