Bio

I love historic architecture, roller coasters, and a host of other random, barely-related subjects.


People Christopher Riley is Following

End of Christopher Riley's followed conversation feed



People Following Christopher Riley

Christopher Riley has no followers.


Conversations Christopher Riley is Following (20)

Display starting at 20 of 20 followed conversations


Conversations Christopher Riley has Started (2)

Christopher Riley's Profile

Christopher Riley
Name:
Christopher Riley
Joined:
Dec 15, 2012

Recent Comments

Christopher Riley

I feel obligated:

This is Spinal Tap - Stonehenge

Huh. I seem to have stumbled upon Ricochet's mysterious time machine. That, or my computer is prescient.

Edited on May 10, 2013 at 2:13am
Christopher Riley

MSMDC:

Nearly all contemporary schools of architecture disdain real classicism, and as a result, we're stuck with so many botched traditional buildings courtesy of architects who needed a lot more Vitruvius or Palladio in school...

I have to wonder, though, if today's "botched traditional" buildings will be viewed by future generations as works of art, much as we (I) view vernacular, technically incorrect Greek Revival structures of the mid-19th century as art. The builder of the house I linked to the photo of was hampered by his lack of formal training, but he made up for it in imagination. Today's problem, I think, is that nearly every designer is formally trained, and still can't produce a decent-looking product.

You're probably talking about grandiose commercial and governmental architecture, so the relevance of my comment is questionable...

Edited on April 29, 2013 at 10:05pm
Christopher Riley
For Mad Libs, the answer to any question is always eugenics.

Too often true.  Last spring, I attended one of my school's weekly Junior State of America meetings.  Among the more notable topics of discussion was a proposal to use unintelligent people as a form of renewable energy (!).  If I remember correctly, the suggester was only half-joking.

I'm not especially appreciative of the sentiment here, considering that I am one of those likely to suffer from the "clipping."  Are we talking about destroying only elite colleges (i.e. Harvard and Yale), or our current system of post-secondary education in general?

Edited on April 9, 2013 at 11:47pm
Christopher Riley

Please, let this be satirical.

Edited on April 6, 2013 at 2:57am
Christopher Riley
EThompson: I think the biggest fallacy of all is that young women give up love and romance to devote themselves to a career, as if this were an either/or situation.

Hallelujah.

The choice isn't between work and marriage. If anything, the choice is between work and children.

Christopher Riley
My counselor in college even told me so. He said most top colleges no longer put much emphasis on grades or test scores. It was more like "do you have an interesting personal story to tell?" It sounded to me like I was auditioning for a part in some TV show. There, obviously "be yourself" is horrible advice (unless you're Mother Theresa or Andrew Luck or that kid who made millions designing a new app). Unfortunately we can't all be champions.

Gosh. Did you attend my high school?

I find myself in this predicament currently. In my case, though, it isn't that I'm immature or unmotivated; rather, I choose to devote my extra time and energy to matters not sanctioned by the school.

Edited on April 4, 2013 at 3:19am
Christopher Riley

I'm curious to know how many schools actually require kids to play dodgeball nowadays.  In my years of schooling, I never once participated in it, and my knowledge of its existence comes solely from mentions by adults.  Perhaps, I'm just sheltered.

Edited on March 29, 2013 at 12:16am
Christopher Riley

This phenomenon is clearly demonstrated by a study in Dianna Muntz’s excellent book, Hearing the Other Side,which shows that there is an inverse relationship between how much education someone has and how many people they talk to that they disagree with: those with the most education have the fewest disagreements with one another, and those with the least formal education have the greatest exposure to contrary points of view.

Interesting. I'd have expected a graph of the situation to look more like the ever-applicable bell curve.

Christopher Riley

Inspired by "A Salute to Maps?"

A few rural counties are needlessly omitted from "What Work Pays in Rural America."  Brown County and Madison County, to provide two Ohio examples, aren't metropolitan by any stretch of the imagination.

I'd use this opportunity to plug some of my own maps, but the comment formatting box is giving me errors.

Christopher Riley

Most people, I've found, are at least somewhat involved in sports.  I'm not at all surprised that those interested are less likely to be lonely than those who aren't.  The New York Times article is definitely targeted toward a certain minority demographic.

Personally, I couldn't care less about sports, and I despise any activity that involves mass vocal participation.  At least I know I'm in the minority.

Edited on March 10, 2013 at 12:36am
Christopher Riley
HeartofAmerica: But you are right, I don't know too many kids who have a good sense of direction (and in more ways then just good map sense)...

It's quite unfortunate, isn't it? Most of my peers are dreadfully ignorant about anything geography-related. I've even met people (native Ohioans) who believe that Franklin County extends all the way to the Ohio River. The saddest part isn't an absence of technical knowledge, but the general lack of appreciation some have for the world around them.

Edited on March 4, 2013 at 12:04am
Christopher Riley

Thirty.

A significant portion were lucky guesses.

Christopher Riley
Schrodinger's Cat: I agree that wherever you go, take a heavy load of core courses. Even if your major is in science, you will still want to take courses in the core Lib Art subjects (history, literature, languages, etc.)

Is minoring in a subject of interest worthwhile? Or, does simply taking classes dealing with those subjects fulfill the same goal?

Christopher Riley

Lucy Pevensie

Geology.  Really.  It's important to think about it because you don't find geology programs at every school, so you can't necessarily decide on it later.  Do a little reading about it.

I've done reading. In fact, the book Roadside Geology of Ohio sits on a shelf a few feet from my desk. :) Geology and chemistry go hand-in-hand, I think.

The one caveat is that geology is largely tied to extractive industries, which don't have a huge presence in Ohio. I'm not sure how stable the field will be in the future, with government regulation and whatnot.

Christopher Riley

Thanks for the wonderful advice, everyone.

I should add, much too late, that math is simply not my strongest subject. Rather, my skills lie in the liberal arts sphere and, oddly enough, science. Any field based entirely on math, as great as it is in terms of job prospects, is not something I can imagine myself doing.

Christopher Riley
Masked Man: To turn just a bit facetious for a moment, do not undervalue the role of partying at college. Not only should it be an exhilarating time in your life, but the social dimension is also a part of learning, that is, how to get along with -- and make sense of -- a wide variety of personality types. It is also, frankly, an important networking opportunity for you. Get to know as many of your college mates as you can, and stay in touch, because you will need each other in an increasingly competitive work environment.

I never plan to "party" in a conventional sense, being an introvert and all, but I am aware of the social benefits of college. I certainly hope it's an improvement over high school.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In