Starve the Beast: ...The establishment wants the glory of passing new amnesty. The base wants to secure the border and enforce the laws that are already on the books, the laws that were passed by previous generations of glory-seeking politicians but that have never actually been enforced.
The establishment insists that we need the young workers to do the jobs Americans won't do. The base wonders how this can be with record numbers of people collecting food stamps.
The establishment insists that if we get out in front of amnesty, all those new immigrants will vote Republican. The base wonders what the establishment is smoking.
the Dems see conservatism as a deadly enemy to be defeated. The Republican establishment sees conservatism as a... um, deadly enemy... to be... well, er... defeated. · 26 minutes ago
I can only "like" this comment once but I LOVE it, and think it bears repeating. Who do these bozos actually represent? My one Republican representative (my senators are Boxer and Feinstein--weep for me) has been phoning it in for years. What are they smoking indeed?
How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?Two. One to hold the giraffe, and the other to fill the bathtub with brightly colored machine tools.
I would love to have the opportunity to focus on higher value work. Unfortunately the value of the work I do is artificially depressed by citizens of other countries who are here in spite of our laws and are willing to work for a wage that is too little for me to live on.
...
Plus it makes suckers of those of us who paid the money and jumped through the hoops to come here legally. · 42 minutes ago
"Unfortunately the value of the work I do is artificially depressed"
It's similar to saying that we are worse off because Wal Mart has figured out how to sell groceries at such a low price.
No, it's actually suggesting that just because buying things that "fell off the back of a truck" saves you money, it doesn't justify the damage it does to the economy or other people, who don't seem to be very real to you.
Workers from poorer countries would experience a dramatic increase in their standard of living, and Americans would have more time to focus on higher value work.
I would love to have the opportunity to focus on higher value work. Unfortunately the value of the work I do is artificially depressed by citizens of other countries who are here in spite of our laws and are willing to work for a wage that is too little for me to live on. The US doesn't have money to continue to support the education of our military's children because of the sequester, but somehow there is money to educate the children of people who came here in defiance of our laws.
I have no objection to allowing immigration if it is structured in a way that benefits the country and is conducted legally, but it is absurd to think that people who don't respect our laws enough to enter the country legally will respect our other laws if they inconvenience them in any way. Plus it makes suckers of those of us who paid the money and jumped through the hoops to come here legally.
President Carter was a huge boost for the right. Both my husband and I were on the left, as were all of our friends, when we realized that my husband was working from January through mid-September before the government allowed him to keep any of the money he made. He retired at 45 and closed 3 businesses. The one he sold went out of business after 6 months when the new owner ran it into the ground.
We started reading The American Spectator and later National Review, and realized that our values and ideas were actually much better represented on the right.
Unfortunately our youngest son doesn't like to talk about politics but has absorbed a lot of liberal claptrap over the years and has become more of a leftist out of inertia. It is painful, but if one day he actually starts paying attention hopefully he will get over it.
Interesting that Hollywood is now mirroring our dear leader's prejudice against Britain.
I enjoyed the movie but thought it petty that at the end they mention the date of the release of the hostages without mentioning that it was, not coincidentally, Reagan's inauguration day.
Anne R. Pierce
David Semark: Not to mention that it was British embassy staff who first rescued the 6 American diplomats, hid them and then passed them on to the Canadians prior to their extraction. Quite the opposite of Mr Affleck's claim in "Argo" that the "British turned them away". A betrayal and a travesty.
Thanks for this. I was not aware of this; was going to discuss Argo more in terms of some of the impressions it leaves about overall American foreign policy at the time, but maybe some of you who are informed on the details of the mission itself can help me with my post later by filling in some of the blanks! I'd appreciate it. · 1 hour ago
Dr Steve: With all due respect, I would be more inclined to take Miss Manners' word for it if I knew which level of education she had attained. Does she hold the BA, the MA, or the Doctorate in manners? If none of the above, why do people persist in insisting that she knows what she is talking about?
Why does anybody listen to any advice columnist? · 22 hours ago
Justine Olawsky: I wonder how someone competent enough to gain an advanced degree could stand being married to a man as incurably stupid as Joe Biden.
I am convinced he is suffering from some degree of dementia and that for political reasons people are turning a blind eye. During the State of the Union speech he was repeatedly laughing inappropriately. He has always suffered from Foot-in-Mouth disease, but the goofiness of his recent pronouncements and behavior is so extreme I suspect a medical cause.
For the first time in years I forced myself to watch our preening, arrogant president for a whole hour. This is a brilliant and accurate distillation of his speech. Bravo!
Highly Selective Institutions: Harvard, Yale, Stanford, etc. At these schools tuition makes up a small portion of their revenue, with most of the revenue coming from endowments, grants, federal research dollars, etc. While they don't need it, having a high nominal rate of tuition helps them keeps up prestige.
Don't discount the effect of rationing. Any scarce resource with high demand has to be rationed in the sense of limiting consumers to those who value the commodity the highest.
It has changed because the colleges are giving more aid now, but when our two boys went to Dartmouth we crippled ourselves financially because it was worth it to us. We know richer people whose kids went to public universities although they were accepted to Ivies, because they weren't willing to change their own lives that much.
We got what was most important to us--our boys have fascinating careers with exciting, fulfilling futures, while many of their peers, just as bright and motivated, are underemployed or living at home. The other parents got what was most important to them--financial security. Everyone wins. Insert government money and it messes up the natural rationing.
In the time you've been on Ricochet have you seen any change or progress in the overall thinking of those at Ricochet?
... My time would be better spent building or participating in a Libertarian forum/website.
How about Ricochet posting a survey? It could be simple:
1. Do you self identify as conservative, Republican, libertarian, centrist moderate, progressive, liberal, Democrat or none of the above?
2. Have any of your positions on issues changed after reading or commenting on a Ricochet post or podcast?
I would be very interested in the responses.
btw, my husband and I went from almost socialist to conservative from reading The American Spectator in the '70's, though admittedly Jimmy Carter had primed the pump.
Sangiovese: When I recently traveled to Colombia, I had no expectation that anyone would speak with me in English. The burden was on me to speak in their language as much as possible. If I found someone who spoke English, then it was a bonus. Similarly, when someone comes to the United States, especially if they are here to live, the burden is on them to learn at least conversational English. If they find Americans who can speak Spanish, then it's a bonus.
It goes both ways. ·
I learned French in Canada and have taken a lot of flak over the years from Hispanic employees and chance acquaintences for not speaking Spanish. In the past few months I've started responding in French to people who approach me and only speak Spanish. It isn't punitive, nor is it well thought out, I'm just tired of struggling to understand and taking grief for not showing enough "respect" for Spanish speakers.
Youtube has some astonishing videos of interviews with proponents and victims of FGM. It is too horrifying to go into here, but it is fascinating what extraordinary things people believe. The bottom line seems to be the belief that no man will want to marry a woman who isn't mutilated.
Donald Todd:Barkha Herman: #5 I knew this lesbian couple - a Hasidic Jew and a Catholic, who went to Massachusetts as soon as gay marriage became legal.
What I found immediately interesting was that what was most important to both women was the opportunity to be married to each other. They did not let Hasidic, Jewish, or Catholic beliefs stand in the way of what was important to them.
Accordingly, their respective religions were useful as props for your statement, but nothing else. · 54 minutes ago
I thought the whole point of the story was that they were ignoring much more important religious strictures and only obeying when it suited them (i.e. the Catholic who liked her life of leisure and ignored the prohibition against homosexuality suddenly being too religious to get a divorce). I thought that was hilarious.
Barkha Herman:...more often than not, people use Religion for various reasons, with little understanding or devotion.
I worked for a man who went to mass every day, every doorway and piece of furniture had a medal of a saint attached somewhere and he talked about Catholicism as if it was a cargo cult. He worshiped so God would make him rich. They had a deal. He and his wife used birth control, but did it in a way they thought God wouldn't notice. It always puzzled and amused me that he thought he could fool someone who created the universe.
Re: Jeb's Folly
Starve the Beast: ...The establishment wants the glory of passing new amnesty. The base wants to secure the border and enforce the laws that are already on the books, the laws that were passed by previous generations of glory-seeking politicians but that have never actually been enforced.
The establishment insists that we need the young workers to do the jobs Americans won't do. The base wonders how this can be with record numbers of people collecting food stamps.
The establishment insists that if we get out in front of amnesty, all those new immigrants will vote Republican. The base wonders what the establishment is smoking.
the Dems see conservatism as a deadly enemy to be defeated. The Republican establishment sees conservatism as a... um, deadly enemy... to be... well, er... defeated. · 26 minutes ago
I can only "like" this comment once but I LOVE it, and think it bears repeating.
Who do these bozos actually represent? My one Republican representative (my senators are Boxer and Feinstein--weep for me) has been phoning it in for years. What are they smoking indeed?