When I see the snippets of Romney’s campaign appearances on television, he does not seem to making the connection between Obama’s policies and the results we are getting in the economy.  Therefore people do not blame these results on President Obama and his administration.  It is more like a litany of statistics, and an unnecessary movie review of a movie I have seen so many times that I have memorized part of the dialogue.  In addition, he needs to address the points raised by Clinton.  I just don’t think a fact-based, logical argument is going to convince the remaining undecided voters at this point.

You might be interested in reading my post here, here and the latest... here.

As I watched and listened to Bill Clinton at the Democrat Convention, I felt he gave Obama and the Democrats a framework to successfully run against Romney.  He buttressed his argument with many “facts” that were simply not true and erected many straw men, but the base argument was a persuasive one: Obama inherited a terrible situation caused by Republicans; no president could have done better than Obama did; and the Republican complaint that the recovery has not been fast enough will not be addressed by implementing their “failed policies of the past”—deregulation and tax cuts for the rich.  These are powerful arguments for the undecided voters if they are repeated until they become “truth”, particularly for those who have not been paying attention.

clinton would have never given that speech under ordinary circumstances. that "clinton" speech was supposed to be delivered by obama, but had no credibility with the public, so they borrowed The Centrist and let him deliver the lines.

During the debates, Obama won't be as effective in making the same points, because he doesn't have clinton's bipartisan-centrist reputation.

I agree.

why not use Paul Ryan to rebut the many points made by clinton? and if it becomes a word war between Clinton and Ryan, so be it.

Romney has an awful campaign team, and he should have replaced them a long time ago-- but I don't blame Romney for his libya comment (i was one of those egging him to make it) and this 47% thing was made in May--it was the media who timed it's release for maximum damage (after the libya "gaffe")

the media beating romney is getting will not end till election day

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2012/09/this-could-be-opportunity-for-romney.html

You know what else I'd like to see? The Tea Party coming out and defending the substance of Mitt's remarks--however inelegantly the way he puts it.

"Thanks for for hiring me, American voters. You are my boss, and I will do the task that was given to me: FIX THE D!@# Economy! Kill OBAMACARE!"

;)

as opposed to Obama's slogan: "Bin Laden is Dead, GM is Alive!"

that's romney going populist, using his business experience to "connect" with voters in a way that they can understand: You are my Boss, I just work for you guys.

Romney's new message should be: If i'm lucky enough to be elected president, I will work for the American people--they are my boss, even those who didn't vote for me.

They are my boss, they are also my clients--and I will look out for the american people's financial and security interest always.

will there be a gangnam style episode next season?

jodi long has the best lines.

steve byrne is perfect as the straight guy. watch his facial reactions to the craziness around the bar.

vivian bang is redundant.

i didnt like the last episode.

How many Canadian embassies were spared because they had quasi anti blasphemy laws in Canada? In the pre-internet days, the American version of free speech could work...

California may eliminate algebra for eight graders

http://www.city-journal.org/2012/cjc0914bezw.html

you need to do the second part first, see if it survives the challenges to it in the supreme court by dems and raza-ists.