Mr. Poulos (in Forbes) quotes an LAT article about the wonderfulness of a recent buyback. I don't believe a word of it. The LAT has no interest in a frank evaluation any gun buyback, and the LAT article is basically a fluff piece to make liberals in and out of government feel they are "making a difference".
Gun buybacks are not immediate, popular, market-driven, or effective. Anybody who participates in a buyback program is either disposing of junk (for more than market value), a government-sponsored shill, or foolish.
Buybacks are mistaken in theory. The problem isn't too many guns. The problem is too few guns in the hands of responsible people.
Thank you Ann Coulter. Barry is an economic and moral retard and worse. He's a liar. He spouts sophomoric Marxism. He holds all of us in contempt. He wants to fundamentally transform the greatest nation in history.
BUT, we can't make fun of him because we're supposed to be polite and deferential at all times. Hell, half the right is so cowed by Alinsky that the left doesn't have to say a thing. Even here we find people "outraged" at the use of the word "retard". Well, sorry, but Barry is a retard, and I hold him in contempt.
Note Eastwood's imagery: Obama sitting, small, silent, sullen, profane, and petty. And the left's attacks draw attention; maybe the message will spread.
The DK rant posits a typical leftist fantasy dystopia where the employer's greed is only exceeded by his malice.
And, of course, the solution is to vote Democrat since Democrat directed bureaucrats will fix business but good.
It's funny except these people vote. The next DK post might very well be about all the problems at work. Job or no job, they are likely victims, and regardless, they know of a lot of people who are victims.
Re: Phalluses, Phalanxes, and Fallacies
Must admit this is a very effective means of disrupting and debilitating our military effectiveness, and I believe that is the objective.