Bio
Alainnah Robertson, Toronto, Canada: Born in Kinlochleven, Scotland, brought up Church of Scotland. Ordained Elder, Presbyterian Church of Canada. Nowadays spiritual, not an adherent of any religious system. Proud Canadian.
Retired Business Owner. Lived in Scotland; on Anglo-American mines, Copper Belt, Northern Rhodesia/Zambia; Stewart BC, Vancouver, Edmonton, presently Toronto, Canada.
Passions: History, comparative religion, comparative politics, philosophy, psychology, physics, etc.
Love: Running, swimming, cycling, golf, cross-country skiing, daily exercise program, etc.
Follow: Cinema, music, art, you name it.
Really LIKE to have discussions with friends in coffee shops, and to laugh!
Presently on an intellectual quest to understand American Politics, and Americans. This involves studying the ideologies of the Conservative Right including Libertarians, and the Progressive Left.
Email: alainnah.robertson@gmail.com
Motto: "An unexamined life is not worth living." Socrates, Greek philosopher in Athens, Ancient Greece, (469-399 BCE) As quoted by Plato in Dialogues: Apology 38a.
This section of Red Feline's profile is hidden.



Re: What does this movie say about modern marriage?
Schrodinger's Cat: A sequel should explore the effect on the unseen wife and son.
This sounds like progressive movie utopia. Idealize a relationship without exploring the consequences on others who are affected.
It is easy to make a movie that ignores reality. · 39 minutes ago
Before Midnight didn't idealize the relationship. That was part of the point. It was all so realistic. My friends, who are married, both found it painfully so. Instead of enjoying a romantic evening together, the couple were busy thrashing out what they were going to do about the future.
If a sequel explored the consequences on Jesse's first wife and son, it would certainly be very interesting. The son had a good relationship with Jesse, and seemed to be doing well in life. But if Jesse moved back to America, what would be the reality there?