People Polyphemus is Following

End of Polyphemus's followed conversation feed



People Following Polyphemus

Polyphemus has no followers.


Conversations Polyphemus is Following (6)



Conversations Polyphemus has Started

Polyphemus has not started any conversations.

Polyphemus's Profile

Polyphemus
Name:
Polyphemus
Joined:
Feb 4, 2012

Recent Comments

Polyphemus

I want to know if you responded to your friend. What do the rest of you do with the similar posts from friends that we all get? I responded at first but have started to ignore because of the odd blending of my personal and work life in Facebook. Not sure I'm ready to go whole hog with that. Maybe I'm a coward.

Polyphemus

[Edited] Thomas, Why the hostility? Kipling is a fine thing to read to a 3 yo. The topic, by the way, is hers. She was in the process of constructing it when you say she strayed from it.

Edited on Apr 12 at 4:46am
Polyphemus

Mike Wallace ushered in the era of sensationalistic, agenda-driven, smug tele-"journalism". I'd like to line up the multitude of victims of his slanderous brand of muckraking for him to pass by on his walk to the judgment throne. Hopefully he gained some humility before he passed away or it won't go well for him. If you've ever talked with someone involved in a story covered by 60 Minutes, you know what I'm taking about.I heard him interviewed years after he retired. I have never heard a man so in love with his own voice before. I'm sorry for his family and hope my impression is wrong, but I see his body of work as a corrosive agent on our culture.

Polyphemus

Aaron Miller: Unfortunately, this is a weak line of attack. Democrats will inevitably blame rising gas prices on the "greed" of oil companies. And greed is easier to understand that a complicated web of specific pressures in legislation, regulation and international markets.

If you believe swing voters won't buy the claim that it's the fault of Big Oil, then your estimation of swing voters is more complimentary than mine. · 18 hours ago

Good point. Even Bill O'Rielly (though not truly a conservative, none the less influential among conservatives and independents alike) swallows this hook, line and sinker. He blames Obama for not "making" the Big Bad Oil companies fix the problem.

That line of thinking will have a certain traction. But, still, our Omnipotent Overlord of Oceania won't be able to paper over his  opposition to drilling and keystone, boneheaded statements about inflating your tires and just switching to an algae-powered economy.

He is vulnerable on this stuff if we're smart enough to press it.

Polyphemus

Instugator

Polyphemus: Don't forget us Windows Phone users. Rapidly passing the sinking BlackBerry. It also happens to have a great interface and user experience. I'd never go back to iPhone personally (believe it or not, Macolytes) . · 0 minutes ago

I am an Androidophile myself, why won't you go back to the iPhone? · 3 hours ago

Nothing against iPhone. I just really love the experience on the new Windows phone. It just seems so fluid and beautiful to me. I kind of now see the whole grid of icons for every app (ala iPhone and mimicked by Android) as kind of clunky. It's just personal preference. I know people have an ingrained view of Windows, but the new phone is really a great platform.

Edited on Feb 20 at 11:55am
Polyphemus

Don't forget us Windows Phone users. Rapidly passing the sinking BlackBerry. It also happens to have a great interface and user experience. I'd never go back to iPhone personally (believe it or not, Macolytes) .

Polyphemus
Albert Arthur: I'd still like Peter Robinson to tell us why he thinks it's helpful to the long term goal, which is to defeat Obama in the fall, for him to be carping constantly about how awful the entire Republican field is this year. I happen to think Peter is an influential guy in Conservative politics, and I just don't see how it could be helpful for him, and others like Jonah Goldberg, to be constantly talking down the candidates. Get it together, Peter! Focus on the goal. · 4 hours ago

Do you realize that your statement sounds to those of us who oppose Romney as: "Shut up about Romney!"  "Resistance is Futile!"

You may not think of yourself as saying that but what else are we to get out of it? We have real problems with him. Peter R articulates those better than anyone that I read or hear. I don't want him to sit down and shut up.

BTW, I hear him carping about the wisdom of accepting Romney more than "how awful the entire Republican field is". I say preach it brother Robinson!

Polyphemus
... I just wish that VDH or Donald Kagan would give the full treatment to the Punic Wars that they have given to the Peloponessian Wars. · 11 hours ago

I heartily agree with that. If you want a readable and straightforward but engaging recounting of Hannibal's expedition to Italy, it's hard to beat the old G. A. Henty book The Young Carthaginian. I find his books to be a good introduction to the period he writes about. He was aiming his books for young boys of his era (Victorian) which means, of course, that he was targeting readers with a deeper historical education than the typical college grad of today. 

I didn't discover the Henty books until my 40s but I've been devouring as many as I could find. Great books for boys and girls (and adults) as they celebrate honor, valor, sacrifice and discern good from evil without the taint of our PC culture. 

Polyphemus

 Most of the suggestions here focus on modern or near-modern wars. Here's a vote for the best writer of ancient war fiction, Steven Pressfield. He specializes in Greek warfare and Gates of Fire is the book that should have been our generation's Thermopylae movie rather than 300. My favortie, though, was Tides of War focusing on the fascinating figure of Alcibiades and the Pelopennesian War.

He did a WWII book called Killing Rommel that was wonderful too. His depiction of the honor and sacrifice of fighting men carries a lot of compassion.  But if you're looking for historical fiction on ancient warfare, start with Pressfield.

Edited on Feb 10 at 12:30pm
Polyphemus
Whiskey Sam: ...By giving the technical arguments priority, we de-emphasize the moral component which makes it easier in flush times to ignore the long-term financial ramifications and expand entitlements or other government programs... · 17 hours ago

This is a crucial point. I wonder if the reason we do that is that we have been conditioned to buy into the reflexive cultural code that says the worst thing to do is to be "judgemental" or "intolerant". The Left has been very good at promulgating that notion lest we end up imposing our values on someone else. It's a kind of cowardice masquerading as humility. We shouldn't give in so easily to that.

It doesn't mean, of course, that we are the moral arbiters of all others simply because of who we are. That would be actual hubris. We must be prepared for and welcome dissent, being ready to argue in support of our moral certitude. But having moral certitude is no offense. Rather, abdicating all moral judgements in the interests of being tolerant is the offense.

The irony is that while we've acquiesced, the Left has no problem making moral arguments.

Polyphemus

Charlie in Kobe, Japan: I loved it. Ann Coulter always seems to have done a lot more research than those she debates. And her confidence in herself is inspiring. 
She might be wrong on this point or that, or even on a fundamental issue, but you've got to get up pretty early and stay on your toes to out-debate her.

Dream Match:  Ann Coulter vs. Richard Epstein

  · Jan. 29 at 11:28am

All you need do is listen to the Ricochet podcast where Peter Robinson takes her on. His humble and self-effacing manor may somewhat disguise the fact that he eviscerated her. By the end, he graciously acted as though she had almost worn him down but it was clear that he had nailed her to the wall and left her sputtering. And it was equally clear that she didn't much like it. 

No need for a match of the century. She's already been bested.

Polyphemus

The comparison of referrals for adoption (841) to the number of abortions (329,445) in the article is staggering. It shouldn't be and yet it still is. The cynical black heart of that organization is revealed in those numbers. 

The idea that this is about "choice" as opposed to coercion and seduction for profit is a naked lie.

Welcome Visitor

Already a Member?
Please Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Join Ricochet today!

Already a Member? Sign In