Bio

*Jan.2013- Changed my Profile Pic in honor of the Gun Control conversation.
Christian, work a lot, rarely leave Montana anymore, in between older parents/grandkids, read mysteries/westerns/bios/history, on social networks for our business but found I kind of like it, minimalist except for technology/hot tub, political/social beliefs: for pete's sake be wary and quit jumping on bandwagons; confront/combat fear and seek truth.


This section of PracticalMary's profile is hidden.


People Following PracticalMary

This section of PracticalMary's profile is hidden.


Conversations PracticalMary is Following

This section of PracticalMary's profile is hidden.


Conversations PracticalMary has Started (35)

Display starting at 35 of 35 user conversations

PracticalMary's Profile

PracticalMary
Name:
PracticalMary
Hometown:
Gallatin Valley, Montana
Joined:
Nov 22, 2011

Recent Comments

PracticalMary

Trollish. You can be a non-supporter of someone but one wonders why you felt the need to even post beyond that it's amazing they have her in the poll when she's running for nothing. 

She is ruined. Obviously not, as you (and others) are still talking about her...she is just so unintellectual, why she's folksy! Never comments on her excellent record.

Conservatives need to figure out if they want professional politicians who get elected and join the club, or fighters. No one can say she doesn't fight. Edited to add that she is extremely Libertarian leaning.

Also, she was the ideal GOP candidate (still is), and one of the GOP's stupidist moves was to shun her: has a huge following (they even had a free movie to use), a woman, great service record, could have used all the horrible comments from the Left against them. She is their worst nightmare, which is enough for me.

We'll see what happens in the future. My husband and I were horribly disappointed that she didn't run in 2012- look what we got- and we lost.

Edited 15 hours ago
PracticalMary

This is where the power lies...follow the money. If we were smart Conservatives, GOP, Libertarians would join together and push total reform (my choice is Flat Tax) relentlessly. Every media conversation should relate back to it. Force Congress to become educated answering questions. While reporting other things, this topic is always in the forefront. Make a goal of big changes in 10 years and never give up. Have the facts ready (which are awesome), but also gut wrenching, emotive stories geared toward the LoFo people. Give the guilt ridden, well off, a reason to back it.  

Oh yes, a first step would be to have people pay all of their own taxes and fees instead of employers deducting them- with states joining in. Too many now think it's the government's money, not theirs.

Play the actual IRS commercial I saw on TV where they say to call them with questions, then have disclaimer that you are responsible for any wrong answers they may give...

Libertarians can do their part by only being happy with getting rid of the IRS, calling Conservatives names because they aren't pure, enabling the socialists, and concentrating on legalizing prostitution or something.
 

Edited on May 18, 2013 at 3:41pm
PracticalMary

No surprise here, just worded differently than RINO, governing class, elitists. I just keep getting more and more angry at the ineffectual Republicans...immigration, gun control, now the scandals. 

Reading the tweets #ObamacareInThreeWords really makes me mad. They tweet big, but don't fight. 

However Libertarians have nothing to say in this battle as they only seem to fight with the Left, not with Conservatives, even always saying something like, 'feel that a lot of the Conservatives are too trusting or supportive of Big Government.' Give me a break. They need to choose sides, too, and I am totally unpersuaded it will be for anything more important than SSM, pot, one world government, intellectualizing aggression, etc.

Edited on May 17, 2013 at 4:18pm
PracticalMary
Merina Smith: Gift certificate for Amazon, Barnes and Noble or a restaurant.   · 31 minutes ago

Or Starbucks

PracticalMary
Stan Sneed: Thanks to Doug and Johnny Dubya for reminding why I never want to own a unit or a house subject to a collective anything.  Living out in the sticks does have its compensations. · 7 hours ago

My husband and I were passing a nearby, small, trailer village (on a small one house acreage, right across from the river) the other day. I saw a guy hanging out the window and said that I always wondered if people lived there. They all have nice faded shades of pink and gray in a 60's retro look and outside upholstered furniture.

A really old buffalo used to live there in a pen, but he's been gone awhile.

That's part of my neighborhood in unincorporated Montana...no mortgage, lawn care, staining or painting...Our business/home has been visited by several bureaucrats (most in the last few years) but I bet nobody has asked anything of the unofficial park. That's okay. 

Edited on May 16, 2013 at 5:59am
PracticalMary

Time to launch the Flat Tax Revolution and make them react and keep them so busy they don't have time to bring up squirrels.

PracticalMary

Great Article! However your response is still a little too intellectual. I use the Post Office example all of the time but they just ignore it these days.

You could add a little emotion like, ' Besides studies show Gun Control only hurts the poor and the environment. I think Democrats are pretty mean-spirited about this issue.'

PracticalMary
Babci: If I can vote in a local election, can I also run for a local office?  In my county, the requirements for voting and for running for office are exactly the same (U.S. citizen, 18 years of age and 6 month residency).  Anybody have a problem with non-citizen candidates? · 16 hours ago

Yes. I live in a state that much of the property owned are vacation homes (of well-off, movie stars, and liberal city folk) how about those burgeoning Chinese cities (Idaho)? There are more regulations for getting a hunting license which brings up the point that the Fed gov't owns much of my state.
While owning property could be one of the requirements, more are needed to protect the interests of people in a state and country. As usual there was a simple, no nonsense, list of requirements and not enough enforcement, so then there are lobby groups and MORE laws, on and on...

PracticalMary

Mendel: Larry, you make many salient points here.

But since you ask about having an intellectual debate, I think it is worth reflecting on the status of serious intellectuals on the right.

I would argue that the largest fora on the right (Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly, Drudge) tend to put emotions first and intellect second.  Not that their hosts aren't smart people, but their first goal is to get people riled up.  The result is that many of the luminaries on the right get left in the dark (like Dennis Prager, whose audience is a rounding error of Rush's).

Contrast this with the left.  The most popular radio outlet on the left - NPR - has a much different focus and constantly promotes the left's best thinkers.  Even the Huffington Post regularly has Nobel Prize winners on its front page.

Our intellectuals tower above theirs in terms of seriousness, but they need to find more support among their own team. · 13 hours ago

The GOP's big mistake is not listening to Rush.

PracticalMary

Western Chauvinist

PracticalMary: Oh. I thought he was just inexperienced and clueless. At least that is what many Righty pundits are still saying. 

You know what else they say that gets my hacks up, Mary? Michael Medved says it all the time. "He's a lame duck." Oh, lawsy, are these people naive, or what?! 

In order for Obama to be powerless to affect his transformation of the country, he'd have to have some regard for the Constitution, or the rule of law. He doesn't. He's consistently worked around Congress and any other limitations the law has put on the office he holds. And he plays the media like a fiddle. 

Can you think of a coalition of "loyal opposition" which might stop him? I can't. · 0 minutes ago

As far as I can see he's gotten almost everything he wants and beyond that, gives everyone the finger (I first said 'thumbs his nose', but that is not really what he does). If you get almost everything you want that means you are WINNING.

PracticalMary

Sometimes I just want to give up but then realize everyone may not be right of center on Ricochet...including Libertarians.

One world, one government. Great idea/

PracticalMary

Oh. I thought he was just inexperienced and clueless. At least that is what many Righty pundits are still saying.

PracticalMary

Can this be real?! 

PracticalMary

He's only a Republican because he's from New Jersey, and he's definitely not Conservative.

PracticalMary

I reject bi-partisian, get-alongness even on a personal level these days. Having just spent a few months in central Oregon I realized that there were many Conservatives. Almost without exception they were SO nice and agreeable they couldn't bring themselves to discuss anything that might set a Leftist off because they didn't want to be 'disruptive', or something, and obviously being perceived as nice is most important.
 Changing the Culture begins at home- just say you think the Democrat Party (notice I didn't say 'they') are Fascists and want to control everyone and everything. Their self-image needs to be attacked, not stroked.

Edited on May 11, 2013 at 3:53pm
PracticalMary

Try thinking it as following something to the logical conclusion instead of the catchy 'slippery slope' phrase.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In