Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:
- Let your voice be heard! Join the conversation -- or start your own.
- Follow your favorite Contributors and fellow Members
- Enjoy Premium Podcasts
- Read Member-initiated conversations
- Keep tabs on your favorite conversations
- Like, Quote or Share your favorite post or comments
- Receive special Member-only invitations... and more!
Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place. Join today!
Already a Member? Sign In
Re: The Nanny State Strikes Close to Home
I don't think I am over reacting. I think this guy is a lefty teacher who likely thinks it's OK for the school/state to dictate what is and isn't healthy.
A couple of years ago this same teacher broke up groups of girls, telling them that they had to be doing something other than talking in groups during recess .
A few days later I asked the principal what that was all about. She replied that they were trying to discourage girls from forming groups in order to head off potential drama/gossip. After suggesting that her policy was a possible infringement of the freedom to associate, she backed off.
Aside from the freedom of association issue, this is what girls have always done, so it seemed like a bit of social engineering to boot.
Nutritional needs are not one size fits all and the teacher's comments regarding the unsuitability of my daughter's snack placed him squarely between me and my daughter. How did he think she came to have that Clif Bar in the first place? That, more than anything, is what I won't tolerate.