Jojo: I have heard repeatedly that after a 5pm briefing in an already scheduled meeting, Obama was incommunicado until early the next morning. But Andrew McCarthy says Hillary Clinton's February Congressional testimony mentioned a10 PM phone call with Obama! Shortly after which, Clinton issued the "response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet" story.
As you said, the video story did not arise during successive drafts of the talking points. The talking points were successively revised to conform to the video story. · 5 hours ago
This is key. That 10 p.m. phone call is the missing piece.
Thank you for putting all this together. Trying to keep track of all the scandals and have a life has been a little taxing and I am glad to have a grip on the chronology and cast of characters here. You make a good case for Hillary as the origin of the video narrative.
Did not hear the podcast, but I agree with you, Bereket. Everyone seemed to understand that character matters until the Clinton episode. And then the fact that a lack of character led the President not only to betray his wife, but to commit perjury, was excused because his politics were good (i.e. liberal).
If it was indeed argued on the podcast that we should focus on Sanford's politics, well, ...doesn't that sound a lot like those who excused Clinton?
Unless the point was that post-election we really have no other choice.
~Paules: You might recall during the Watergate scandal that the Doonesbury comic strip featured a brick wall going up around the White House. Each day the wall grew a little higher until the final brick blotted out the White House completely. Perhaps the Obama administration is laying the foundation today for something similar. · 0 minutes ago
How do you think the Obama scandals will play on Doonesbury? Or won't they?
Pat is right--it's all about how angry the press gets.
No, forcing participation and taking something that belongs to others-- even if it's "just" their information-- is not a "free market" thing to do. · 5 hours ago
We do it with respect to financial disclosures all the time, don't we? Information is important in markets; it doesn't have to be individually-identifiable, but it still needs to be there. · 7 hours ago
So now you want to make a national database that people are required to put all their financial information into?
Exactly how much forced disclosure do you want to demand of others? In the name of "free markets," of course? (Not so very free for those that are having things that are theirs forcibly taken, but you don't seem too worried about that-- just jump to name calling.) · 0 minutes ago
At least we know the government would never take information confidentially provided to the IRS, for instance, and use it for politi....oh, wait, never mind.
Jojo: Hey WC made James Taranto's column in the Wall St Journal with this post! In kind of a booby-prize category that's actually a compliment to the catchy headline.
Score!
Maybe I have one other career option in times of trouble. Catchy headline writer. · in 2 minutes
Indeed. It's under the heading "Questions Nobody Is Asking", where it doesn't really fit. Which says to me it was such a great headline they had to use it somewhere.
I think the idea that big data and sophisticated research/design can save failing schools is something of a pie-in-the-sky and a distraction from more serious problems.
The data isn't supposed to save failing schools; if anything, I hope it's used to close them. It's supposed to help education entrepreneurs design newschools; help evaluate what works, and what doesn't. · 46 minutes ago
One of the advantages of a federal system is that we don't need to perform experiments on the entire population of the country. States can and do try things out and the things that work can be and are adopted and adapted by other states. The things that don't work haven't caused nationwide damage.
Also, I suspect that the tendency of CC will be to squelch educational entrepreneurship. We have a governing elite that is not interested in entrepreneurship generally and definitely not in educational entrepreneurship, which threatens the state monopoly.
Glad you brought it up. NRO has this piece by Maggie Gallagher about Common Core and how Indiana is having second thoughts. It begins with some actual observations by a couple of mothers about what their children were or were not learning in school. One of the cases involves a Catholic school. Indeed, one of the results of Common Core will be an erasing of differences between regular public, charter and private schools, including religious schools. I imagine its effect on homeschooling will be chilling also.
I do feel like we just keep discovering new fires we have to try to put out. Like Obamacare, Common Core was foisted upon us in a most undemocratic way and needs to be rolled back.
The underlying message is, "You can't trusta man to provide for you adequately, or to not abandon you at some point."
It's worth considering circumstances that are no one's fault. Illness or accident can disable a man or kill him, and a woman ought to have a Plan B for those possibilities.
Those interested in the subject might like Alejandro Chafuen's Faith and Liberty: The Economic Thought of the Late Scholastics. Chafuen shows that Catholic religious thinkers understood the moral superiority of free markets even before Adam Smith wrote about it.
Re: Just Sayin'...
Good chuckle, but fortunately or not, untrue. That would make Nancy Pelosi 65 and she is clearly well into her 80s.