I think they do manual breast exams.  

In this, I imagine they're outpaced by your typical college fraternity. Maybe Komen should start sponsoring Greek Week keggers instead.

Good luck!

[Originally commented that I couldn't find anything either, but then I stumbled upon a study, and posted it as an answer.]

He offered to present her husband's resume to companies in his area.  

It's a tough question to handle delicately, because there are all sorts of awkward explanations -- ethical lapses, personality or work ethic issues, or some arcane subspecialty her husband is mired in -- that could affect her husband's employability.  

Can this President give a succinct answer to... anything?  

The relevant section is No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; ... Does Farah believe Rubio doesn't qualify because his parents weren't born here, or because they weren't yet naturalized when he was born?

23 years?

Sorry I couldn't have been more helpful. If there's anything I've missed, I welcome the correction.  

NCP, the outfit that commissioned the study, is run by a woman. Clearly, she thinks that parking with one tire on the sidewalk is proper, and graded the subjects accordingly.  

I don't get this Republican Establishment stuff. To riff off a current AT&T mobile ad:

What? Is the GOP Establishment like some kind of... summoner that can just summon votes for its anointed candidate?

I would have preferred Daniels, Barbour, Christie (not because he's conservative, but because he has guts), Rubio, or Ryan to any of the current choices.  And Romney is close to the last on the list of current choices.  But if primary voters pick him, I'll support him.  

A third party would give Democrats the keys to the White House -- without having to even pretend to be moderate -- for the next twenty years.  

Please spare us this, E.J. 

Well put.

I'm inclined to agree with you, Toni. Dr. Ablow speaks with the authority of a medical doctor, although for the life of me I can't figure out how he can speak to this conclusion (given the difficulty in getting accurate data on either form of faithfulness): 

You can take any moral position you like about men and women who cheat while married, but there simply is no correlation, whatsoever—from a psychological perspective—between whether they can remain true to their wedding vows and whether they can remain true to the Oath of Office

More to the point, Mr. Gingrich's serial transgressions seem to indicate someone with an enormous ego and questionable character. We don't need another four years of that.

Is accusing Mr. Robinson of petty jealousy really called for?  And on what basis?

Just quickly coming across this question, so my hurried response doesn't really rise to an Answer. But this article has some statistics in it. http://www1.american.edu/ted/chocolate-slave.htm

Estimates of the number of children forced to work as slaves on (Cote d'Ivoire) farms are as high as 15,000 (Save the Children Canada)

The last I checked, even the direction of the change (if any) is in question.