Will NR now let Kevin go for being controversial? ;)

In my current situation, I support all 4 of us with just my income. My wife supports the household with hours of not just chores, but errands, and appointments for the kids. She thanks me for going to work to support the family, and I thank her for making what I do possible.

We are the happiest couple we know in our age group.

I was not the one demanding score keeping, someone else was, thus my question.

If I work 60-70 hours a week and provide the income that supports the household, while my wife works 35-40 for money for her, how, exactly should the chores be divided up?

An honest question:

If both are working full time they should share 50/50?

What is one makes significantly more money for the household than the other? Should chores still be split 50/50 then?

Both might work full time, but there are different ways of working full time. Maybe one works more hours. I would wager, that there are often households where the income balance is not close to parity. Someone is getting paid a lot more.

yes.

13/13. I could have answered these all correctly when I was 13 I imagine.

I think A Boy Named Sue is odd but fun.

I never jump to the conclusion of maliciousness when ignorance will do.

I did look it up, and you agreed to it. Time defined in such a way that is has to be measured.

So, how do you measure time? I use a watch. What do you use?

All you have to do is define time, yet you refuse to do it.

How about:

the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, or condition exists or continues

That is a standard way to define time on every place I looked, on and off the web.

If that is not how you define time, please explain how this definition is incorrect.

How do you tell time, Larry? How hard a question is that to answer?

I am anxious to hear: TIC TOC Time's Wasting

Seems to me that Sutter could just be out to get paid. They will reap the fees regardless of the outcomes, and now they have the state to make sure they get to perform the procedure and get paid.

Now, I don't think this is going on really, but couldn't such a system as we see here be open to that sort of abuse?

I would love to see this answered. However, I don't think an answer is forthcoming.

Larry:

One misunderstanding of Relativity is that it "overturned" Newton. That is not the case. It added to Newton's understanding. For instance, pure newtonian physics cannot explain the orbit of Mercury. With Relativity added you can.

Your every day understanding of the world is a newtonian one, as it is for all of us. Relativity almost never comes into play in our day to day lives.

Larry:

Ah so you picked B by saying that the GPS clocks run at a different speed, as predicted by the theory of relativity and therefor that is a reason to question the theory of relativity.

I am sorry to say it, but so far Larry, you sound just like any other conspiracy follower. You have found one guy who says something "profound" that contradicts years of scientific research and embrace that to the exclusion of all else. Anyone that disagrees has "Drunk the kool-aid" or "You guys just believe this stuff with no reflection at all" which is a way to say we are closed minded.

You present no evidence to back up your claims, ignore the evidence from the other side, and persist in  argumentum ad lapidem , argumentum ad antiquitatem , and ad hominem attacks. In short, you come across like every believer in ghosts, ESP, UFO's and The New World Order. 

Larry,

You can choose to believe whatever you want. However, the GPS Sats have atomic clocks that run faster on Earth in order to keep the right time up in orbit because they orbit so fast. That is a real-world, practical application of how time changes base on the frame of reference.

Why, if you are right, would the guys building the things do that? GPS works because your relation is measured in relation to something in orbit. Use the link on works to see why the clock has to be accurate.

If you believe that GPS works, then you have already accepted everything you are arguing against, even though you don't know it.

Of course, I guess you can tell me you don't believe in GPS, and try to argue that either:

A: It does not work at all

or

B: It works, but everyone else is wrong about how it works.