Bio

Midwestern owner of a small business.  Gun collector.  Political junkie.  History buff.


This section of skipsul's profile is hidden.


People Following skipsul

This section of skipsul's profile is hidden.


Conversations skipsul is Following

This section of skipsul's profile is hidden.


Conversations skipsul has Started (98)

Display starting at 98 of 98 user conversations

skipsul's Profile

skipsul
Name:
skipsul
Joined:
Mar 21, 2011

Recent Comments

skipsul

Yudansha:CONT.

Khan - Call me crazy but liked BC's version of Khan better than RM's.  It was mentioned earlier that he played not one iota of swagger -- he was clearly ruthless though.  As for his race? Come on --  eugenics-- remember?  If you can make someone as strong as three men, how hard can it be to add blue eyes?  His basso-profundo rumble is marvelous. And who's got a cooler name thanBenedict Cumberbatch?  I just love that name!

I have to ask, though, if BC is so good why not make him his own villain?

Khan was originally his own man, in this he struck me as a weenie and not really clever.  Physically tough, sure, but not so smart.  I'm sorry, I don't believe a villain to be smart just because people in the move tell me he is.  

BC was a pawn, not a Khan.

skipsul

Amy Schley

Yes, if the story was better written it would have incorporated a backstory for how Khan is both a Latin man with an Indian name and a taste for quoting Herman Melville and a pasty Brit who kicks butt in fistfights.  But it didn't.  This theory is consistent with all the information provided in the movie and helps give the movie increased depth and emotion.  So that's what I'll believe to help make the story better than what was presented. 

I don't try inventing backstories to try to resolve plot discrepancies, I try to avoid plot discrepancies in the first place.  I also take stories as they're presented.  If a story has holes, it's not my job to fill them, it's the writer's job.  I'm not there to do the work the writer was too lazy or incompetent or careless to do.

Which brings up the point, why Khan at all?  If they named him anything else it would have improved the film, otherwise it's a silly sop to sentimentalism.

Khan was a true villain originally, in this he's just a tough tool.  They made him sympathetic.

skipsul

Amy Schley

skipsul

Sabrdance: I'm still mulling, but my one sentence review was "if you wanted to see what Wrath of Khan would look like if it was badly written and ham-handedly produced, then this is the movie for you."

I'm stealing this line.

Yup, Spock doing the "KHAAAANNN" thing was gratuitous and hammy.

You got 1 thing wrong, Khanberpatch does NOT have Montalban's chest: · 0 minutes ago

Khanberbatch doesn't need to ... he has the voice of a purring jaguar making love to a cello.

I could listen to that man read the tax code and be completely enthralled. · 11 minutes ago

Your bias betrays you.

skipsul

Amy Schley

As for Khanberbatch, I came across a fascinating fan theory.  In Space Seed, there are 84 Augments. ID has 72 frozen Augments plus Khanberbatch.  The movie establishes that thawing these people out is very difficult. So what if those missing eleven Augments were killed as failed attempts to thaw them out, and the "real" Khan was one of them? They awake Cumberbatch's character who was one of Khan's lieutenants  and he finds out Khan is dead.  "Khan" is a title more than a name, so Cumberbatch takes on the title of Khan (note that only Spock Prime adds the "Noonien Singh") and the responsibility for taking care of the remaining Augments.

This is going to sound mean, but...

I'm sorry, but this explanation reads like a Jay Carney press conference explaining why Benghazi was really perpetrated by the rogue IRS, who were suffering under the Sequester.

skipsul
Sabrdance: I'm still mulling, but my one sentence review was "if you wanted to see what Wrath of Khan would look like if it was badly written and ham-handedly produced, then this is the movie for you."

I'm stealing this line.

Yup, Spock doing the "KHAAAANNN" thing was gratuitous and hammy.

You got 1 thing wrong, Khanberpatch does NOT have Montalban's chest:

th

THAT is the chest of Khan.

Edited 14 hours ago
skipsul

Mike Hinton: @skipsul

I too live in Franklin County, cheers!

Yikes, that's quite the story. So, you feel these kinds of entities would still pop up spontaneously in a privatized world and require a larger legitimate authority to smash them? · 18 minutes ago

BTW, cheers back at you!  Always glad to meet another local.  Still trying to actually meet EJ Hill as he's a local too.

skipsul

Mike Hinton: @skipsul

I too live in Franklin County, cheers!

Yikes, that's quite the story. So, you feel these kinds of entities would still pop up spontaneously in a privatized world and require a larger legitimate authority to smash them? · 0 minutes ago

I've known too many petty tyrants, you have to have something to use against them, short of selling your house and moving.  

Take homeowners' associations: pure unadulterated evil.

I became president of mine just to make sure it never did a damn thing after (5 years later my neighbors ask, what association?).

My wife is a lawyer and has had to represent friends who have been victimized by HOAs.  The HOA deed restrictions are a sort of "land slavery", and unless forbidden by the state are pretty well impossible to contest.  

Also, the people who run the HOAs or local governments tend to be those most interested in minding others' business (and landscaping).  Unless caught in a major scandal these become lifetime sinecures as local reporting is basically useless. 

Hard to fight the power unless you can bring in bigger guns.

skipsul

Where do I begin?  Didn't hate it, but...

For crying out loud, if you're going to do a fance "reboot" at least show some originalism!  Egad but it was silly.

I could nitpick the time and space contractions, but what annoyed me most was this:

Why does Hollywood always have an admiral or general gone rogue and trying to start a war as the "real" villian?  This is such unbelievable BS, not to mention done absolutely to death.

Ugh.

Insulting.

skipsul

The King Prawn

skipsul: The real mistake here is in Congress delegating away its powers.  It is on Congress to set and enforce limits.  The failure to do so is the heart of our troubles. · 14 minutes ago

This is my thinking on it. The battle should be between the elected branches with the judicial only refereeing the fight. Perhaps a chain linked octogon instead of a committee room is a more appropriate venue. · 0 minutes ago

Thunderdome?

skipsul

The real mistake here is in Congress delegating away its powers.  It is on Congress to set and enforce limits.  The failure to do so is the heart of our troubles.

skipsul

I say again to look at the link in #8 on New Rome Ohio.

It actually took a collaboration at the STATE level to bust that little kingdom.  First they had to ban mayors' courts for communities with fewer than 100 people, then get ODOT to re-examine the speed limit imposed, etc.

Multiply that myopic cronyism by about half of the townships in the USA (collaborating with the unions) and you have an idea of the scope of the problem.

I know Fred doesn't want me to say this, but as in Ohio it will take a top-down action to break the power of those fiefdoms, with state & federal regs to keep the petty mayors from trying to take it back.

You've got to do as Ohio and change the rulebook on how these guys work.

skipsul

Mike Hinton: Often when one brings up privatizing things that people have only know to be public the retort is something like: "But I foresee this-and-that-problem. Privatization wouldn't be perfect." But privatization is not competing against perfection, it's competing against government. And when you look at it that way, privatization tends to become more plausible as an alternative.

skipsul

3.  WATER RIGHTS.  This is the biggie.  Neighboring fire departments are well known to deliberately use different fittings from their neighbors.  Yes, even public fire departments can be territorial jerks, making hydrants incompatible with each others' trucks, and these are supposedly public servants.  

Would private companies engage in the same behavior?

If they did, we'd be no worse off. · 2 hours ago

I know that.  You know that.  

But there are few tyrannies more staunchly defended than petty small-mid sized bureaucracies.

See Here for one near me.

skipsul

I actually work pretty closely with the fire and rescue equipment industry, am 3rd generation in it and have lots of relations in it too.  Fire departments are embodiments of cronyism and emotional blackmail.  They're also less necessary than supposed as catastrophic house fire are less frequent due to improved building codes and advances in materials (old neighborhoods excepted).

However, disentangling them from public funding is very tricky for a couple of reasons:

1.  Marcus Livinius Crassus:  he started a fire brigade in Rome which had a certain mercenary rep.

2.  Fire companies will be regulated like medical insurance companies - with all that entails.  See Obamacare.

3.  WATER RIGHTS.  This is the biggie.  Neighboring fire departments are well known to deliberately use different fittings from their neighbors.  Yes, even public fire departments can be territorial jerks, making hydrants incompatible with each others' trucks, and these are supposedly public servants.  

Would private companies engage in the same behavior?

Not to say that the case shouldn't be made, but these are some of the starter arguments.

skipsul

My father used to run a manufacturing business (auto industry).  They got targetted by a vindictive OSHA inspector who was collaborating with a disgruntled employee.  Inspector would show up unannounced (which was not allowed at the time) demanding to see some are of the shop where a "violation" had been reported.  Never found the alleged violation, but dang if he didn't spot something else while there.

Fines well into the 5 figures over safety glasses (a worker was alleged to have taken his off to rub his eyes) and mandating a safety harness for a guy on a 6 ft stepladder (mandated harness would not have caught him unless he had fallen at least 10 ft).  Took OSHA to court demanding to know who kept filing false reports.  The judge even sided with my father and ordered OSHA to give names and open records, OSHA never complied.  Took a call to congressman to get the heat off, but then the congressman of course wanted some grease in the form of PR and "contributions to his campaign."

Nasty business all around.

skipsul

Maggie Somavilla: Good chuckle, but fortunately or not, untrue. That would make Nancy Pelosi 65 and she is clearly well into her 80s. · 12 hours ago

Edited 12 hours ago

80s?  I thought she was waaaayyy older than that!  Seemed to figure a lot in Grimm's tales...

skipsul
Mauritius: I agree with the above comments that the politics is driving the panic which is driving the shortage. But all of this is connected, and as 2A advocates (otherwise known as citizens faithful to the Constitution) push back, the politicians provide another wave of bans. This is easiest in the blue states, where they have the whip hand. California is not to be outdone in this recent wave. There are 50+ new guns bills at various stages in the Sacramento legislature (see www.crpa.org). A number of them would drastically affect the ability to buy ammunition in an unfettered manner. I sense that some of these new laws will be ruled unconstitutional, but the legislators can pass bad laws much faster than they can be overturned. · 12 hours ago

Yup, throw everything at the wall and hope some of it sticks.  California and the rest are determined to shaft us all.  Not just on guns, talk to some folks in the auto and trucking industries.  CA is responsible for much harm there too.

Welcome Visitor!
Join  or  Sign In

Become a Member to enjoy the full benefits of Ricochet:

Ricochet: The Right People, The Right Tone, The Right Place.  Join today!

Already a Member? Sign In