Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Quote of the Day: One Standard
“The truth is most conservatives are fine accepting apologies for dumb stuff said or done years ago. Unfortunately, liberals refuse to forgive conservatives so we have no choice but to do the same to you. It doesn’t have to be this way. We only ask for one standard.” – Chris Barron (2019-09-18)
It’s not from an extremely famous figure (he is a Fox Business contributor). It’s not an extremely pithy one-liner. In that tweet, however, you have the summary for so much of the current situation in the GOP.
The modern cancel culture is a nightmare, but until people on the Left learn that it can come back to bite them, it’s not going anywhere. There has to be one set of rules for everyone, one standard. Otherwise, we are creating special classes of citizens. I am not a second-class citizen, and I will not be treated as such. Therefore, I demand the same rules that apply to me apply to my political opponents.
Stop the canceling, stop the woke patrol, stop the heresy trials, stop treating our existence as a problem to be solved, and we gladly return the favor. Until then, enjoy the rules that you wrote, applied to you.
Published in Group Writing
Sometimes the only way to change the rules is to enforce them evenly
The Quote of the Day series is the easiest way to start a fun conversation on Ricochet. There is only 1 open day left on the September Signup Sheet, and many days open on the October Signup Sheet. We even include tips for finding great quotes, so choose your favorite quote and sign up today!
After years of Republicans acquiescing to the one way street I am so happy we are now making them live by their rules. After they feel the sting for a while it might ease up for everyone. And if it doesn’t, at least the field is more level.
I suppose Al Franken serves as the example for these guys living up to their standards. Obviously, they have buyers remorse, but since then it’s been clear that they learned their lesson.
The problem with one standard is that the Left really enjoys being the mob. It is like wrestling in the mud with a pig. You both get dirty, but the pig likes it.
Al Franken should be treated like Louis C.K. They are gross and weird but they aren’t serial rapists. They need to take a significant hit for bad behavior but then they need to be allowed but into the public square with the expectation that they will be better.
But the left won’t accept this compromise so a part of me thinks that we shouldn’t either. This is a confusing deal for me.
#me also! In Franken’s case, he helped create the state that took him down…. He got what was coming. In the case of Louis C.K., I’d put good money on his ousting being the result of a great, (fairly pro-life, or at least anti-abortion) bit that he did as an opening for his routine a few years ago… heck, I don’t think he’d put up much argument on the claim that he’s gross and weird.
This is the explanation for the entire situation:
Heresy.
To a Progressive, their ideas are the only correct ones. It is their Religion.
And they treat non-believers like heretics.
Thus the punishment of heretics AND the protection of the believers is not hypocritical. There is no double standard in their eyes.
To an outsider with a critical view that belief system – and the behaviors that come with it – is blatantly obvious.
So, the backsliding believers are merely sinners, not full apostates or infidels?
I think you are wrong there sir. Louis C.K. went full abortion at the end of his bit. Though potentially, maybe, some lefties saw that he had an inkling of wrongthink.
Yeah. I was thinking about the “it’s 100 percent murdering a baby” line, but your right.
I’ve got a kind of distorted view of this debate because I grew up a few decades after Roe and was raised around progressives. So I guess I tend to see anything that strips them of their belief that they occupy the moral high ground is a shot against “pro-choicers.” I’m pretty confident that most of them see it that way too.
Back when Bill Clinton’s college foolishness was dragged out in the open (pot-smoking, draft dodger, etc.), I remember thinking, “If we are gonna be judged by how we behaved in college, nobody is safe.”
I absolutely detest Bill Clinton, but I gave him a pass for his college misdemeanors. And I think most of the country did as well.
Today’s candidates will not be forgiven so easily, it seems. It looks like the Spanish Inquisition is upon us. And nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAn7baRbhx4
I completely agree! But how do we do that? Where is the venue where we can hold them accountable and fight back? I fear that they don’t really care what we think or if we criticize or judge them. After all, they are superior to us.
Saul Alinsky’s Rule #4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules”
“But Mommy, she bit me first!” fails as a replacement for the principles governing a republic. In a nation, there’s no Mommy.
What about Hillary?
The right can attempt to “cancel” all the legit candidates on the left, and it won’t stop the left from cancelling people. I think the left will regard their losses as collateral damage, and regard a cease-fire as acquiescing to Evil that needs to be rooted out. They have the media on their side, which will be curiously incurious about pursuing past transgressions.
“Troubling allegations surfaced today in the form of a credible accusation that Vice President Mike Pence was present at an event that disparaged gays and African-Americans. We go to correspondent Joy Reid, who is in studio with Governor Ralph Northam to discuss the accusations.”
I mean, does that sound ridiculous?
The trick isn’t to “cancel” the Left.
The actual trick is to set things up so the leftists cancel each other.
That is already happening, because they finally pushed the envelope so far that they have no choice in the matter. The various left-side factions are so invested in their own little worlds to the point that they desperately need enemies to aim at, and there are so many more nasty lefties that are easy targets. A lot of those factions also hate each other now, to the degree that they no longer care that much about collateral damage, as long as they think they’re correct.
They tried to go after Trump for being a chauvinist pig, but that immediately led to the obvious left-wing toads in showbiz, and eventually Epstein.
Mommy Dearest, perhaps…
She’s some kind of mother…
I never cared about Bill Clinton’s college age antics. I cared a lot about the fact that he lied about them.
Bill Clinton was the second person to make me yell at the television and scare my dogs (the first was Dallas Cowboys receiver Alvin Harper).
I think this is almost correct. The problem is, though, that “The Left” will never be able to excuse the social transgressions of “The Right” because those transgressions occur because of the essential makeup of “The Right.” It is who they are: They are deplorable bitter clingers, so OF COURSE they act in deplorable ways. Moreover, they cannot act any differently. White, Christian Heterosexual males are racist.
Period, full stop. Racism is as much a part of us as our mitochondria is, so no forgiveness is ever possible.
For people like Trudeau or Notham or others on ‘The Left,” though, such racism is an abhorrent anomaly. It is not who they are, they just made a regrettable error, and they will be forgiven for it, even if (in Trudeau’s case) they make it over and over and over again. He is completely incapable of being racially insensitive at his core, they say, because of who he is.
I find this fascinating, because it is the completely opposite of how I was raised. I was raised in Canada, in a multicultural neighborhood, and I knew, at an early age*, that painting your skin to portray another race was way, way out of bounds. You just didn’t do that**, yet somehow, this is a lesson that some leading progressives never learned.
And I have no idea why, other than to say that you show me someone who is suffering from liberal guilt, and I’ll show you someone who has at least one reason to feel guilty.
—————————————————————————–
* Ok, in order to spare myself any shame in the future, I must confess that when I was younger, I dressed up in a costume to portray another race. At the age of 8, in order to pass myself off as an ancient Jewish shepherd, I wore a housecoat on-stage in my local church’s Christmas pageant.I regret the error.
** Ask C. Thomas Howell how his career took off after “Harvard Man.”
I think that Kirsten Gillibrand was never going to be nominated due to her treatment of Al Frankin. I dislike his politics but the penalty he suffered was completely out of proportion.
Concur. In this battle, we should not “bring a knife to a gunfight”. Sad as that necessity may be.
And look what THAT got the country. More of the same behavior.