Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
London High-Rise Fire Tragedy Result of Environmentalist Regulation
The highrise in London which recently burned, killing many was so devastating because it was recently clad with exterior insulation material to make it more energy-efficient.
The fire started in a lower-floor kitchen and rapidly spread up the entire building due to a “chimney effect” caused by the cladding.
Insulation keeps heat in. Basically, they converted the building into a giant kiln.
Jeremy Corbyn blames cuts to local council funding for the tragedy, but this cladding was part of a multimillion-dollar renovation.
About 30,000 other buildings around Britain have also been covered with this insulating cladding.
Published in Environment
Yep. Tell all those folks who died of or suffered from malaria while DDT was banned or harder to get due to environmentalists.
Arrgh, I wondered how this could have gotten so bad so fast that so few could get out, and had heard that it might be due to the ‘cladding’ going up. I thought it just just a facelift kind of thing, a new facade. Now it begins to make sense…
This starts to make sense. I had been wondering if it was old. I used to live in those types of buildings, but in those the floor and ceiling are concrete and every apartment is firewalled, so I couldn’t figure out how it could spread that way unless it’s differently constructed.
The Guardian has an article on this which despite its start when one “expert” refers to “the government’s mania for deregulation”, the truth can be find later in the piece:
What a brilliant idea, covering a building in a flammable sheath. All change is not necessarily progress.
Environmentalism is a pagan religion. A lot of them (not Roman paganism, but certainly Carthaginian and Western Asian ones) required human sacrifice to propitiate the gods. Through that lens, those that died are burnt offerings.
Seawriter
Too soon.
I don’t think they were using polystyrene, but there was about a 2 inch gap between the insulation and the cladding, and the cladding itself is flammable.
That is nothing short of insane.
Yup.
This is an international disaster.
A similar problem has arisen in the Middle East.
The next big crisis may be mercury poisoning from the light bulbs the environmentalists have strewn about the civilized world. Mercury penetrates soft tissue. That’s why pharmacists used to use it to get iodine into wounds.
What’s next I wonder, wood stoves that are actually made of pressboard.
Nope. Too late. At least for those sacrificed on the altar of environmentalism. And if the point I made is not made early, and forcefully, and often, more people are going to die.
Seawriter
The cladding is a thickness of polystyrene foam between two sheets of steel. I believe the two inch gap is what is between the wall of the building and the inner layer of metal to allow ventilation to keep moisture from accumulating.
Seawriter
Not by a long shot. Let’s start with ethanol. ;-)
What was the carbon footprint of the fire?
How much NOx, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, and other real pollutants did it dump into the atmosphere?
Mis,
Environmentalism attempts to make engineering/energy issues into moral issues. Engineering choices just involve physical results that involve trade-offs. Thus a virulent ideology is produced. The ideology fixed narrowly on producing its specific result ignores the reality. Often the gain is trivial while the side effect is extremely dangerous.
Finally, and perhaps worst of all, the ideologues refuse to admit the error.
Regards,
Jim
It’s always interesting when the environmental freaks (of which I am one) are at odds with the safety freaks, especially in those cases where they are one and the same persons.
I’m glad DDT use is greatly restricted now. Malaria has been pretty much eradicated from my part of the world, too.
Don’t worry. Call Bill Nye.
As someone who had both environmental and safety responsibilities I know what you mean.
OK. Right. Sorry.
It is the only pure element that crosses the blood brain barrier. That would be correct, I think. I read a long article years ago in the Atlantic Monthly about a researcher at Dartmouth who was studying this, and she suffered brain damage just from contact with pure mercury. As I think about it, the article said it was the only element that did.
I cannot find the article. Sigh.
I would love to hear the Prince of Wales weigh in on this. However, I’m certain I’ll only hear crickets.
Well said.
I heard an NPR thing on this yesterday but they didn’t talk about cladding. Instead they talked about how tenants had complained about safety to what sounded like uncaring landlords for years. I had a picture in my mind of an old slum of some sort… interesting that this was the issue.
Not shocking since it’s NPR.
Perfect illustration of the unintended consequences of a policy prescription motivated by “science”. It would seem that most of the people in charge don’t understand the concept of “higher order effects”, or at least don’t acknowledge that they exist. I wonder what the environmental impacts are of the aerosolized particulates and the extra atmospheric CO2 that are a direct result of this burning building. In principle, a cost benefit analysis could be conducted comparing the expected gains from the renovations to the increased risk of the building burning down.
Check out this story from Oakland, CA. What they do not mention is that the hallways of the building were filled with discarded mattresses and piles of clothing (read: tinder). Now the tenants of the halfway house are suing the owners for “slum like living conditions”… that they themselves are in large part responsible for.
You can find the original proposal to refurbish the building here:
https://www.rbkc.gov.uk/idoxWAM/doc/Other-952368.pdf?extension=.pdf&id=952368&location=VOLUME2&contentType=application/pdf&pageCount=1
It makes it clear that:
“The aim of this report is to identify how, as part of the Grenfell
Tower refurbishment scheme, the current energy and
environmental comfort problems can be addressed, and how the
chosen solutions sit within the London Plan’s aim to bring
existing housing stock up to the Mayor’s standards on
sustainable design and construction.
The poor insulation levels and air tightness of both the walls and
the windows at Grenfell Tower result in excessive heat loss
during the winter months. Addressing this issue is the primary
driver behind the refurbishment.”
As much as I’m tempted to jump on the “it’s all the green weenies fault”, I’ll hold off.
According to what I read, YMMV, the building passed the most recent fire inspection. Granted, that might mean nothing. The standards might originate around the time of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire. I was surprised to read there was no sprinkler system. Or, as is not uncommon in some cities, the fire inspection was pencil whipped.
In spite of my lack of science credentials, while the idea of the cladding and the chimney effect sounds perfectly logical, I do know fires act strangely and often surprise professionals while actually fighting fires.
My default is to be suspicious of government. There’s been allegations from a tenant organization about faulty alarms and other problems well before the fire. And we all know governments are inclined to skimp on basic facility maintenance.
But this is such a horrible tragedy, I’m willing to wait for the professionals to investigate.
The hallways of the building could have impeded the firefighting, but discarded mattresses aren’t why the walls of the building on the outside were burning.
News photographers are all looking for the dramatic shot, so they usually shoot something as big as a burning building for a panoramic shot, but if you look at the panels underneath the windows, they look like charcoal.
Sorry, I should have been clearer— my comment was with reference to a building that burned down recently in Oakland, CA. Mind you, this is the second big fire with loss of human life in the last year in Oakland (the other is the infamous Ghost Ship fire). In both cases, the tenants created a death trap by leaving garbage, furniture, etc. lying around.