LeBron James, Racism, and a Missed Opportunity

 

Speaking to reporters on the eve of the NBA Finals, LeBron James soberly addressed what many blacks believe is the ongoing presence of racism in American culture.

The reason James was discussing racism instead of the upcoming series against the Golden State Warriors? Someone spray-painted a racial epithet — the racial epithet — on the security gate in front of James’ Los Angeles residence.

Coincidentally, the incident involving James happened the same day a noose was reportedly found at the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington DC. According to a US Park Police account, tourists discovered the noose inside the museum’s Segregation Gallery, Wednesday afternoon.

The general and redundant pattern following reports like these is for blacks — and white sympathizers — to reflexively point to such incidents as “proof” that racial discrimination is still pervasive, despite the considerable progress made in marginalizing its influence to the periphery of American society.

And LeBron James did exactly that.

Responding to reporters, LeBron James said, “[I] look at it … to shed a light and keep the conversation going … it just goes to show that racism will always be a part of the world, a part of America.” James went on to say, “No matter how much money you have, no matter how famous you are, no matter how many people admire you, you know being black in America is tough. And we got a long way to go, for us as a society and for us as African-Americans, until we feel equal in America.”

There’s so much to unpack here.

First, the disclaimer that in saner times would go unmentioned. Racial discrimination still exists, and will continue to exist in some form, on this side of heaven. But in America, racism is no longer the omnipotent, omnipresent, prohibiting force that members of the racial and black grievance industries would have the country believe.

That said, in both situations — the vandalization of James’s home and the noose found at the African American history museum — caution in assigning blame should be strongly advised. At this point, no one knows who committed either incident. Instinctively presuming the guilty party is white and the actions were racially motivated, especially in the age of racial hoaxes and fake hate crimes (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, I could go on), has been shown to be demonstrably imprudent.

As many of these and other racial hoaxes demonstrate, the perpetrator of either incident may be black. Consequently, both acts should be condemned in the strongest possible terms because they’re wrong and immoral — on their own merits — but also because of what these acts signify and the division intended by them, despite the assumed color of the culprit.

As for James’ response to the situation — I can only groan in disappointment. This is where I believe blacks never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity, and they never miss a chance to play the victim.

As a friend rightly noted, being black in America isn’t tough for LeBron or anyone who plays professional sports. This also applies to those who’ve earned success in the entertainment industry. The multimillion-dollar home vandalized by graffiti in Los Angeles is a second home; his primary residence is in Cleveland. LeBron’s salary is more than $30 million per year (not including endorsements). He’s worth almost $400 million, and has made almost $500 million since entering the NBA 13 years ago. He accomplished all of this despite only earning a high school diploma. Essentially, LeBron James has it exactly backward when it comes to being rich and black in America. Believe me, if earning half a billion dollars in slightly over a decade is what’s considered ‘tough’ for a black man in America, sign me up.

Twice.

Being black is much easier where he lives literally, and financially speaking, than it is to be black where I live, literally and financially speaking.

And it’s easy for me.

Unlike LeBron — who owns a house in Brentwood, CA, one of a number of liberal/leftist enclaves in the state — I live in a middle-class area in California that was once designated a sundown town. For those unfamiliar, a sundown town is a place where blacks aren’t permitted after sunset. Though the place has changed, old habits and perspectives die hard. One can still count the number of black residents on two hands. Additionally, the consistent (racial) resentment is still palpable.

Nevertheless, I maintain that it’s easy being black — even in this regard — particularly when black life today is placed in context and juxtaposed to what blacks once endured as normal, everyday life.

However, there are ways in which being black in America is tough, just not in the way LeBron James thinks. In my estimation, the tough part of being black in America comes much, much more from the unforced errors — the self-debasing, self-limiting, stigma-inducing actions and behaviors of other blacks — than it does from the caricature of the white racist. Or even a real white racist.

Imagine a black person who has rejected self-sabotage and who is desperately trying to overcome the stigmas such as violence, incompetence, inferiority, aberrance, the crutch of affirmative action, and other racial stereotypes that precede that person as a direct result of the culture of chaos that far too many blacks have cultivated, and that far too many other blacks have refused to forthrightly, consistently, and publicly reject and condemn. Despite the open-mindedness and good nature of many people, regardless of color, the black reinforcement of these degrading stereotypes oftentimes seems insurmountable.

This, LeBron James, is tough. Indeed, it is the black person’s burden.

I wish LeBron James had used the unfortunate incident as a “teachable moment,” downplaying what happened to his home but at the same time putting it in proper context.

James should have urged people not to jump to conclusions. He should have acknowledged that though the epithet is a relic and a lamentable part of our history, he wouldn’t allow the action, or intent behind the action, to be an obstacle to his family continuing to enjoy what was once referred to and celebrated as the American Dream. He should have encouraged blacks to follow his lead — not letting racial insults impede their aspirations and dreams.

Instead, he used the opportunity to reinforce the false narrative that blacks, no matter what, are still never-ending victims of white racism.

Published in Culture
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 37 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Derryck Green Member
    Derryck Green
    @DerryckGreen

    Kate Braestrup (View Comment):
    The exercise will do nothing whatsoever for anybody—certainly not for people, black white or other, who actually need help. It’s selfish and therefore sinful …

    And in the meantime, little kids in Chicago are getting shot because the city government can’t be bothered to provide them with adequate protection–why did no one invoke Emmet Till when little Levontay White was murdered?

    PREACH!

    • #31
  2. Derryck Green Member
    Derryck Green
    @DerryckGreen

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):
    Also, addressing the rising rates of murder in Chicago means facing the reality that black men who are young poor and fatherless have a cultural problem with violence. It is psychologically easier for many blacks to complain about racism and not talk the most serious problems in the black community.

    Psychologically easier, for sure. But remember- blacks have been rewarded with innumerable socio-economic goodies in exchange for reinforcing their victim status for more than 50 years. So not only is it psychologically easier, it affords material goodies that facilitate comfort and good living- certainly for middle class blacks, and they have NO plan to give that up quite yet. For poor blacks, it’s made being them comfortable in poverty (while compromising human dignity), and dependent on progressives to ensure the maintenance of that comfort (again, at the expense of their dignity). Further, both classes have benefitted from a separate but lower low level of expectation, and reduction of normative condemnation for immoral behavior responsible for black cultural dysfunction.

    Really is sad, all the way around. But I don’t fault leftists; they are who they are. I fault blacks for allowing it to happen, and attacking those who try and bring attention to it. Blacks, particularly those in the middle and upper class, have no excuses for being agents of black futility and compromising black independence and the constructive rebuilding of black life and reputation.

    • #32
  3. Derryck Green Member
    Derryck Green
    @DerryckGreen

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    I can’t believe you missed such a great opportunity to say “black man’s burden.

    Lol! Interestingly enough, the original draft included that phrase but I wanted to universalize the message.

    That said, I’ve been working on a post with the original phrase since Friday.

    • #33
  4. Boss Mongo Member
    Boss Mongo
    @BossMongo

    Derryck Green (View Comment):
    This irrevocable marriage between blacks and victimhood has and will continue to be our undoing, until we recast victimization as something to be overcome rather than managed.

    ‘S why I love Ricochet: people articulate thoughts of mine that have been strong but inchoate.  And do it way better than I could.

    • #34
  5. Henry Castaigne Member
    Henry Castaigne
    @HenryCastaigne

    Derryck Green (View Comment):
    But remember- blacks have been rewarded with innumerable socio-economic goodies in exchange for reinforcing their victim status for more than 50 years. So not only is it psychologically easier, it affords material goodies that facilitate comfort and good living- certainly for middle class blacks, and they have NO plan to give that up quite yet. For poor blacks, it’s made being them comfortable in poverty (while compromising human dignity), and dependent on progressives to ensure the maintenance of that comfort (again, at the expense of their dignity). Further, both classes have benefitted from a separate but lower low level of expectation, and reduction of normative condemnation for immoral behavior responsible for black cultural dysfunction.

    It isn’t just black people that suffer from a culture of victimhood. The books, The True Story of a Part-time Indian and Hillbilly Elegy, talk about Native-American and Appalachian white victimhood respectively and it is equally destructive. If you believe that the world is against you, you and your community don’t put in the effort that it takes to succeed. As Adam Carolla so succinctly put it, “I’ve never known anyone successful that thinks of themselves as a victim. Sometimes they’ve been screwed over but they don’t have a victim mentality.”

    • #35
  6. Jerome Danner Inactive
    Jerome Danner
    @JeromeDanner

    Derryck Green (View Comment):
    As for the podcast, absolutely.

    I am going to message you to see about setting something up.  I appreciate your thought and time.

    • #36
  7. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Derryck Green (View Comment):
    For poor blacks, it’s made being them comfortable in poverty (while compromising human dignity), and dependent on progressives to ensure the maintenance of that comfort (again, at the expense of their dignity). Further, both classes have benefitted from a separate but lower low level of expectation, and reduction of normative condemnation for immoral behavior responsible for black cultural dysfunction.

    Really is sad, all the way around. But I don’t fault leftists; they are who they are. I fault blacks for allowing it to happen, and attacking those who try and bring attention to it. Blacks, particularly those in the middle and upper class, have no excuses for being agents of black futility and compromising black independence and the constructive rebuilding of black life and reputation.

    Gertrude Himmelfarb pointed out the difference between the Victorian emphasis on virtue in contrast to the modern values:

    The ancient virtues were not the Christian virtues, and they were certainly not the Victorian virtues. But what was common to all of these virtues, to the very idea of virtue, was a fixed moral standard – a standard by which all people at all times and under all circumstances would be judged. Today we have abandoned that idea of virtue and have adopted instead what we now call “values”. Value is a subjective, relativistic term; any individual, group, or society may choose to value whatever they like. One cannot say of virtues what one can say of values, that anyone’s virtues are as good as anyone else’s, or that everyone has a right to his own virtues. This shift from virtues to values represents the true moral revolution of our time.

    An essential part of that revolution has been the destigmatizing of everything except stigmatizing.

    The evil of excessive or “indiscriminate” relief, as the Victorians put it, was that it tended to pauperize [paupers being a stigmatizing term,] demoralize, and thus dehumanize the poor [poor being the working classes, meaning people actually working.] Stigmatization is the other side of the coin of virtue. You can’t have a set of virtues, a system of values, without having a corresponding system of stigmas…

    First, it was from its beginning as much an ethic as a religion; the two were intimately connected, so that the ethic derived its strength from the religion. Second, the ethic was as much a social matter as an individual one; it emphasized the social virtues (charity, good works) as much as the individual ones (work, temperance). Third, it cut across class lines… There was thus created something much like a national moral consensus.

    The question is whether some force equivalent to the moral revolution the Wesleyan movement kicked off in Britain is possible today in the U.S. or elsewhere in the West.

     

    • #37
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.